open access publication

Article, 2024

Clinical trial: An open‐label, randomised trial of different re‐start strategies after treatment withdrawal in HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, ISSN 1365-2036, 0269-2813, 10.1111/apt.18147

Contributors

Johannessen, Asgeir 0000-0001-5966-7166 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] [3] Reikvam, Dag Henrik 0000-0002-4499-0320 [1] [2] Aleman, Soo 0000-0003-0461-4870 [4] Berhe, Nega Belay [2] [3] [5] Weis, Nina Margrethe 0000-0002-3133-2724 [6] [7] Desalegn, Hailemichael [3] [8] Stenstad, Tore 0000-0001-8566-7039 [3] Heggelund, Lars 0000-0002-1669-1032 [9] Samuelsen, Ellen [10] Karlsen, Lars Normann [11] Lindahl, Karin 0000-0002-3759-8603 [4] Pettersen, Frank Olav [2] Iversen, Jonas [2] Kleppa, Elisabeth [2] Bollerup, Signe 0000-0001-9604-4582 [7] Winckelmann, Anni Assing [7] Brugger-Synnes, Pascal [12] Simonsen, Hans Erling [13] Svendsen, Jan [14] Kran, Anne-Marte Bakken [2] [15] Holmberg, Marte [3] Olsen, Inge Christoffer 0000-0001-6889-5873 [2] Rueegg, Corina Silvia 0000-0003-3720-4659 [2] Dalgard, Olav 0000-0003-4470-3181 [1] [10]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Oslo
  2. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Oslo University Hospital
  4. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Sykehuset i Vestfold
  6. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Karolinska University Hospital
  8. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Addis Ababa University
  10. [NORA names: Ethiopia; Africa];

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may trigger a beneficial immune response leading to HBsAg loss, but clinical trials on re-start strategies are lacking. AIM: To assess whether it is beneficial to undergo a prolonged flare after NA cessation. METHODS: One-hundred-and-twenty-seven patients with HBeAg negative, non-cirrhotic CHB with at least 24 months of viral suppression on NA therapy were included. All study participants stopped antiviral therapy and were randomised to either low-threshold (ALT > 80 U/L and HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL) or high-threshold (ALT > 100 U/L for >4 months, or ALT > 400 U/L for >2 months) for the re-start of therapy. The primary endpoint was HBsAg loss within 36 months of stopping antiviral treatment. The primary analysis was based on intention-to-treat allocation with last observation carried forward. RESULTS: There was a numerical but not statistically significant difference in HBsAg loss between the low-threshold (3 of 64; 4.7%) and the high-threshold (8 of 63; 12.7%) group (risk difference: 8.0%, 95% CI: -2.3 to 19.6, p = 0.123). None of the patients with end-of-treatment HBsAg > 1000 IU/mL achieved HBsAg loss; among those with end-of-treatment HBsAg < 1000 IU/mL, 8 of 15 (53.3%) achieved HBsAg loss in the high-threshold group compared to 3 of 26 (11.5%) in the low-threshold group. CONCLUSIONS: We could not confirm our hypothesis that a higher threshold for restart of therapy after NA withdrawal improves the likelihood of HBsAg loss within 36 months in patients with HBeAg negative CHB. Further studies including only patients with HBsAg level <1000 IU/mL and/or larger sample size and longer follow-up duration are recommended.

Keywords

HBeAg, HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B, HBsAg, HBsAg level <, HBsAg loss, NA cessation, NA therapy, NA withdrawal, One-hundred-and-twenty-seven patients, allocation, analogues, analysis, antiviral therapy, antiviral treatment, cessation, chronic hepatitis B, clinical trials, differences, duration, end-of-treatment HBsAg, endpoint, flares, follow-up duration, group, hepatitis B, higher thresholds, hypothesis, immune response, likelihood, likelihood of HBsAg loss, loss, low threshold, low-threshold group, months, months of viral suppression, negative chronic hepatitis B, non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B, nucleos(t)ide, nucleos(t)ide analogues, observations, open-label, participants, patients, primary analysis, primary endpoint, prolonged flare, randomised trials, response, restart, restart of therapy, sample size, samples, significant difference, size, statistically, statistically significant difference, strategies, study, study participants, suppression, therapy, threshold, treatment, treatment withdrawal, trials, viral suppression, withdrawal

Funders

  • Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority

Data Provider: Digital Science