Article, 2024

O-325 PHYSICAL WORK DEMANDS DURING PREGNANCY AND THE RISK OF PRETERM BIRTH – FINDINGS FROM A DANISH REGISTER-BASED COHORT STUDY

Occupational Medicine, ISSN 0962-7480, 1471-8405, Volume 74, Supplement_1, Page 0, 10.1093/occmed/kqae023.1231

Contributors

Sejbaek, Camilla Sandal [1] Flachs, Esben Meulengracht Flachs 0000-0002-2252-8426 [1] Frankel, Hannah Nørtoft [1] Mehlum, Ingrid Sivesind 0000-0003-0830-284X [1] Tøttenborg, Sandra Søgaard 0000-0001-7742-4360 [1] Madsen, Ida E H [2] Rugulies, Rugulies 0000-0002-7752-131X [2] Hougaard, Karin Sørig 0000-0002-3386-0512 [2] Bonde, Jens Peter [1] Begtrup, Luise Moelenberg [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Copenhagen University Hospital
  2. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] National Research Centre for the Working Environment
  4. [NORA names: NFA National Research Centre for the Working Environment; Governmental Institutions; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The objective of this study was to corroborate or refute earlier indications that high workload in pregnancy is associated with preterm birth. Methods The register-based cohort, DOC*X-Generation, included all working pregnant women and their liveborn children in Denmark (1977-2018). Register-data contributed information of gestational age used to define preterm (22-36 gestational week) and extremely preterm (22-32 gestational week) births, and occupational codes during pregnancy – DISCO-88. A Job exposure matrix (JEM) provided information on occupational exposure for each occupation and not individually. Workload was provided by the JEM, physical work demands (Work Environment and Health, Denmark), which assigned each woman with an exposure value based on DISCO-88 occupational codes. Other nationwide registers provided potential confounders. Results The preliminary findings included 1,201,974 women working during pregnancy; of which 4.3% gave birth preterm. Employment in occupations with high physical work demands during pregnancy was associated with a small increased risk of preterm birth (highest exposed group, adjusted OR=1.10 (95% CI 1.06-1.13)) and extremely preterm birth (highest exposed group, adjusted OR=1.15 (95% CI 1.07-1.23)). There was a tendency towards an exposure-response relationship for both outcomes. Discussion Strengths include a non-selected cohort of working women over a 40-year period, including potential confounders, e.g., maternal country of origin and education. One limitation is that the JEM is only based on data from 2012 and 2014, and therefore does not reflect potential changes in physical workload over time. Conclusion This study supports the previous findings of an increased risk of preterm birth due to physical workload during pregnancy.

Keywords

DISCO-88, Denmark, age, associated with preterm birth, birth, birth findings, birth preterm, changes, children, code, cohort, cohort study, confounding, country of origin, data, demand, education, employment, exposure, exposure matrix, exposure values, exposure-response relationship, extremely preterm, extremely preterm birth, extremities, findings, gestational age, increased risk, increased risk of preterm birth, indicators, information, job-exposure matrix, limitations, maternal country, maternal country of origin, matrix, nationwide registers, objective, occupation, occupational codes, occupational exposure, origin, outcomes, period, physical work demands, physical workload, physics, potential changes, potential confounders, pregnancy, pregnant women, preliminary findings, preterm, preterm birth, register, register-based cohort, register-data, relationship, risk of preterm birth, strength, study, values, women, work demands, working pregnant women, workload

Data Provider: Digital Science