Article, 2024

Multiple forms of perceived job discrimination and hypertension risk among employed women: Findings from the Sister Study

American Journal of Industrial Medicine, ISSN 0271-3586, 1097-0274, 10.1002/ajim.23634

Contributors

Coates, Matthew M. [1] Arah, Onyebuchi Aniweta 0000-0002-9067-1697 [1] [2] Matthews, Timothy A 0000-0001-6220-0831 [1] [3] Sandler, Dale P. [4] Jackson, Chandra L 0000-0002-0915-8272 (Corresponding author) [4] [5] Li, Jian 0000-0003-2614-4291 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of California, Los Angeles
  2. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  3. [2] Aarhus University
  4. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] California State University, Northridge
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  8. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  9. [5] National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  10. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertension has been linked to socially patterned stressors, including discrimination. Few studies have quantified the risk of hypertension associated with exposure to perceived job discrimination. METHODS: We used prospective cohort data from the Sister Study (enrollment from 2003-2009) to estimate self-reported incident hypertension associated with perceived job discrimination based on race, gender, age, sexual orientation, or health status. Job discrimination in the prior 5 years was assessed in 2008-2012, and incident doctor-diagnosed hypertension was ascertained in previously hypertension-free participants. RESULTS: Among the 16,770 eligible participants aged 37-78 years at the start of follow-up, 10.5% reported job discrimination in the past 5 years, and 19.2% (n = 3226) reported incident hypertension during a median follow-up of 9.7 years (interquartile range 8.2-11.0 years). Self-reported poor health or inclusion in minoritized groups based on race/ethnicity or sexual orientation were more frequent among those reporting job discrimination. In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for covariates, report of at least one type of job discrimination (compared to none) was associated with a 14% (hazard ratio = 1.14 [95% confidence: 1.02-1.27]) higher hypertension risk. Results from sensitivity analyses reinforced the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that interventions addressing job discrimination could have workplace equity and health benefits.

Keywords

Cox, Cox proportional hazards models, Sister Study, Social, age, analysis, benefits, cohort data, covariates, data, discrimination, doctor-diagnosed hypertension, eligible participants, equity, findings, follow-up, form, gender, group, hazards model, health, health benefits, health status, higher hypertension risk, hypertension, hypertension risk, incidence, incident hypertension, inclusion, intervention, job, job discrimination, median follow-up, minoritized groups, model, multiple forms, orientation, participants, perceived job discrimination, poor health, proportional hazards model, prospective cohort data, race, race/ethnicity, reports, results, risk, self-reported poor health, sensitivity, sensitivity analysis, sexual orientation, sister, status, stressors, study, women, workplace, workplace equity, years

Funders

  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Data Provider: Digital Science