Article,
Economic voting behavior: The peak‐end growth rule
Contributors
Shen, Zekai
0000-0003-0427-7202
[1]
[2]
Liu, Yazhou
0000-0003-2048-0729
(Corresponding author)
[2]
Affiliations
- [1] Singapore Management University [NORA names: Singapore; Asia, South];
- [2] Shanghai University [NORA names: China; Asia, East];
- [3] University of Copenhagen [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]
Abstract
Abstract This paper introduces the peak‐end rule to economic voting, finding that voters focus on peak and end economic growth when evaluating incumbents. Cross‐national data from 595 elections in 70 countries (1960–2020) shows that the average of the highest GDP growth rate during the term and the growth rate in the election year positively impacts incumbent vote share, with peak growth having a stronger effect. Instrumental variable analysis addresses endogeneity. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that less‐educated voters rely more on the peak‐end rule. The findings contribute to understanding voters' behavioral patterns and improving democratic accountability.
Keywords
GDP,
GDP growth rate,
accounts,
analysis,
average,
behavioral patterns,
countries,
cross-national data,
data,
democratic accountability,
economic growth,
economic voting,
effect,
election,
election years,
endogeneity,
findings,
growth,
growth rate,
heterogeneity,
heterogeneity analysis,
improve democratic accountability,
incumbents,
instrumental variable analysis,
less-educated voters,
patterns,
peak,
peak growth,
peak-end rule,
rate,
rules,
sharing,
stronger effect,
term,
variability analysis,
vote share,
voters,
voting,
years
