open access publication

Article, 2024

How aligned are industry strategy and government policy for the decarbonization of energy-intensive process industries?

Climate Policy, ISSN 1752-7457, 1469-3062, Volume ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print, Pages 1-14, 10.1080/14693062.2024.2363490

Contributors

Hansen, Teis 0000-0001-9383-3471 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Andersson, Johnn [3] Finstad, Jørgen [4] Hanson, Jens [2] Hellsmark, Hans [5] Mäkitie, Tuukka 0000-0002-7810-0066 [2] [4] Nordholm, Amber Joy 0000-0002-4990-9798 [6] Steen, Markus 0000-0002-0956-2662 [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Copenhagen
  2. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] SINTEF
  4. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
  6. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] University of Oslo
  8. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Chalmers University of Technology
  10. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];

Abstract

Decarbonization of energy-intensive process industries (EPIs) is a central unresolved challenge for limiting global warming to 1.5°C or well-below 2°C. In this article, we investigate the alignment between government policy and applicable industry strategy in decarbonization efforts across six European countries – Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. We distinguish between ‘target alignment’ (How comparable are the size of the emission reduction commitments?), ‘temporal alignment’ (How closely do the timelines match?) and ‘solution alignment’ (Are the same types of solutions prioritized?). Based on an analysis of national policy documents, company strategies of the 10 largest emitting EPI plants in each country, as well as secondary sources, we find high target alignment. However, we find substantially lower temporal alignment as emitters are reluctant to commit to intermediate targets that match the decarbonization timelines laid out in national government policy. Solution alignment is intermediate across all six countries as emitters generally pursue the decarbonization options prioritized in policy, but with most emitters remaining at the level of ambitions or plans and few examples of commercial investments so far.

Keywords

Denmark, European countries – Denmark, Germany, Kingdom, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, alignment, ambitions, analysis, analysis of national policy documents, commercial investment, companies, company strategy, countries, countries Denmark, decarbonization, decarbonization options, documents, emitter, energy-intensive process industries, global warming, government, government policies, industrial strategy, industry, intermediate target, investment, level of ambition, levels, national government policies, national policy documents, options, planning, plants, policy, policy documents, processing industry, secondary sources, solute alignment, solution, source, strategies, target, target alignment, temporal alignment, timeline, units, warming

Funders

  • Swedish Energy Agency
  • The Research Council of Norway
  • Innovation Fund Denmark

Data Provider: Digital Science