open access publication

Article, 2024

Recombination and polarity effects of Farmer chambers in a strong magnetic field

Physica Medica, ISSN 1120-1797, 1724-191X, Volume 123, Page 103406, 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103406

Contributors

Riis, Hans Lynggaard 0000-0001-7311-3717 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Engstrøm, Kenni Højsgaard 0000-0001-6967-6998 [2] Andersen, Claus Erik 0000-0002-7356-9607 [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Southern Denmark
  2. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Odense University Hospital
  4. [NORA names: Region of Southern Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Technical University of Denmark
  6. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ionisation chamber based reference dosimetry in magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MRL) aimed for radiotherapy requires correction for recombination losses. Published studies have found that such corrections can be carried out using the two-voltage method. These studies have, however, not included comparison with recombination corrections based on the Niatel method, which can be seen as a robust reference method due to its clear separation of initial and volume recombination and its explicit account of the pulsed nature of the dose delivery. The primary objective of this work therefore was to carry out such a comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four Farmer-type chambers (PTW-30006 and PTW-30013) were placed in a water phantom in 1.5 T Elekta Unity MRL. The chambers were oriented antiparallel or perpendicular to the static magnetic field B0 and irradiated at a source-to-surface distance of 133.5 cm with a 10 × 10 cm2 field size. RESULTS: The two-voltage method gave results in agreement (within 0.1%) with the recombination corrections derived from the Niatel method. The recombination corrections from three Niatel parameter sets (one based on a Varian Truebeam and two obtained directly in the MRL) deviated less than 0.1% from each other. A systematic shift in the recombination correction of less than 0.05% was observed if polarity corrections were not applied. CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the use of the two-voltage method in MRLs based on its excellent agreement with the Niatel method. This work, therefore, complements existing knowledge as previous studies have not included a comparison with the Niatel method.

Keywords

Farmer chamber, Farmer-type chambers, acceleration, accounts, agreement, chamber, comparison, correction, delivery, distance, dose, dose delivery, dosimetry, excellent agreement, explicit account, field, field size, ionisation, ionisation chamber, knowledge, linear accelerator, loss, magnetic field, magnetic field B<sub>0</sub>, magnetic resonance linear accelerator, method, nature, objective, parameters, phantom, polarization, polarization corrections, polarization effects, published studies, pulsed nature, radiotherapy, recombination, recombination correction, recombination losses, results, separation, shift, size, source-to-surface distance, static magnetic field B<sub>0</sub> ≥ , study, systematic shift, two-voltage method, volume, volume recombination, water, water phantom

Data Provider: Digital Science