open access publication

Article, 2024

A Multi‐Dimensional Approach to Map Disease Relationships Challenges Classical Disease Views

Advanced Science, ISSN 2198-3844, Page e2401754, 10.1002/advs.202401754

Contributors

Möbus, Lena 0000-0003-0685-0893 [1] Serra, Angela 0000-0002-3374-1492 [1] [2] Fratello, Michele 0000-0002-3997-2339 [1] Pavel, Alisa 0000-0002-2983-0214 [1] [3] Federico, Antonio 0000-0003-2554-9879 [1] [2] Greco, Dario 0000-0001-9195-9003 (Corresponding author) [1] [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Tampere University
  2. [NORA names: Finland; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Helsinki
  4. [NORA names: Finland; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Technical University of Denmark
  6. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

The categorization of human diseases is mainly based on the affected organ system and phenotypic characteristics. This is limiting the view to the pathological manifestations, while it neglects mechanistic relationships that are crucial to develop therapeutic strategies. This work aims to advance the understanding of diseases and their relatedness beyond traditional phenotypic views. Hence, the similarity among 502 diseases is mapped using six different data dimensions encompassing molecular, clinical, and pharmacological information retrieved from public sources. Multiple distance measures and multi-view clustering are used to assess the patterns of disease relatedness. The integration of all six dimensions into a consensus map of disease relationships reveals a divergent disease view from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), emphasizing novel insights offered by a multi-view disease map. Disease features such as genes, pathways, and chemicals that are enriched in distinct disease groups are identified. Finally, an evaluation of the top similar diseases of three candidate diseases common in the Western population shows concordance with known epidemiological associations and reveals rare features shared between Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and Alzheimer's disease. A revision of disease relationships holds promise for facilitating the reconstruction of comorbidity patterns, repurposing drugs, and advancing drug discovery in the future.

Keywords

Alzheimer, Alzheimer's disease, Classification of Diseases, International, International Classification, International Classification of Diseases, T2D, Western populations, affected organ systems, approach, association, categorization, characteristics, chemical, clusters, comorbidity patterns, concordance, consensus, consensus map, data, data dimension, dimensions, discovery, disease, disease features, disease group, disease mapping, disease relatedness, disease relationships, disease view, distance measure, drug, drug discovery, epidemiological association, evaluation, features, future, genes, group, human diseases, information, integration, manifestations, maps, measurements, multi-dimensional, multi-dimensional approach, multi-view clustering, multiple distance measures, organ systems, pathological manifestations, pathway, patterns, pharmacological information, phenotypic characteristics, phenotypic view, population, public sources, rare feature, reconstruction, relatedness, relationship, repurposed drugs, revision, similarity, source, strategies, system, therapeutic strategies, type, type 2 diabetes, views

Funders

  • European Research Council
  • Academy of Finland
  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science