Article, 2024

Rumination in patients with major depressive disorder before and after antidepressant treatment

Journal of Affective Disorders, ISSN 0165-0327, 1573-2517, Volume 360, Pages 322-325, 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.135

Contributors

Segerberg, Tina S S 0000-0002-7420-495X [1] [2] Ozenne, Brice [1] [2] Dam, Vibeke Høyrup 0000-0001-5467-5159 [1] Köhler-Forsberg, Kristin [1] [2] [3] Jørgensen, Martin Balslev 0000-0002-1321-8901 [2] [3] Frokjaer, Vibe Gedsø [1] [2] [3] Knudsen, Gitte Moos 0000-0003-1508-6866 [1] [2] Stenbæk, Dea S (Corresponding author) [1] [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Rigshospitalet
  2. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Copenhagen
  4. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Mental Health Services
  6. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rumination is a maladaptive response to distress characteristic of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). It is unclear to what degree rumination is associated with depression severity prior to treatment and how it responds to antidepressant treatment. Therefore, we evaluated the association between rumination and depression severity in 92 untreated patients with MDD and explored the changes in rumination after initiation of antidepressant medication. METHOD: We measured rumination using the Rumination Response Scale (RRS) and depression severity with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17 or HDRS6) before and after initiation of 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment. The association between RRS and pre-treatment HDRS17 was evaluated using a linear regression model. RRS at week 4, 8, and 12 across treatment response categories (remission vs. non-response) were evaluated using a mixed effect model. RESULTS: RRS was positively associated with depression severity prior to treatment at a trend level (p = 0.06). After initiation of treatment RRS decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) and remitters exhibited lower rumination compared to non-responders at week 4 (p = 0.03), 8 (p = 0.01), and 12 (p = 0.007). LIMITATIONS: The study had no placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Although pre-treatment rumination did not significantly associate with depressive symptoms, rumination was closely connected to change in depressive symptoms. Tormented patients could be reassured that rumination symptoms may be alleviated over the course of antidepressant treatment.

Keywords

Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Rating Scale, Ruminative Response Scale, antidepressant medication, antidepressant treatment, associated with depressive symptoms, association, categories, changes, characteristics, course, course of antidepressant treatment, degree, depression, depression severity, depressive disorder, depressive symptoms, disorders, distress characteristics, group, initiation, initiation of antidepressant medication, levels, linear regression models, major depressive disorder, measure rumination, medication, model, non-responders, patients, placebo group, regression models, remittances, response categories, response scale, ruminants, rumination symptoms, scale, severity, study, symptoms, treatment, treatment response categories, untreated patients, week 4, weeks, weeks of antidepressant treatment

Funders

  • Lundbeck Foundation
  • Innovation Fund Denmark
  • Augustinus Foundation
  • Capital Region of Denmark

Data Provider: Digital Science