Article, 2024

Quantitative modelling of cyclists’ route choice behaviour on utilitarian trips based on GPS data: associated factors and behavioural implications

Transport Reviews, ISSN 1464-5327, 0144-1647, Volume ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print, Pages 1-32, 10.1080/01441647.2024.2355468

Contributors

Łukawska, Mirosława 0000-0002-2581-9210 (Corresponding author) [1] [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] TU Dresden
  2. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Technical University of Denmark
  4. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Despite many years of research and rapid changes in the field of bicycle route choice modelling, a review of factors associated with cyclists’ route choice decisions is missing. This paper reviews 33 studies that employed GPS data and statistical modelling to explain the route choice behaviour of cyclists on utilitarian trips. Factors associated with bicycle route choice are divided into network, contextual, and individual factors. Findings from this review demonstrate that a refined categorisation of model attributes is essential, as the preferences vary greatly between different route attributes. Moreover, the analysis indicates a strong influence of the local context on the attribute definitions and route choice preferences. Although some commonalities between studies w.r.t. the network factors (e.g. a preference towards bicycle infrastructure or avoidance of slopes) can be determined, many results are contradictory or intertwined with other factors. Specifically, results related to intersections, land use characteristics, and interaction with other modes of transport are not always conclusive and are strongly dependent on the local context. However, the explanation of some of the unclear effects can be facilitated by incorporating contextual or individual information in the models. Based on the analysis of the existing studies, this review encourages a joint consideration of studies employing quantitative and qualitative methods to explain cyclists’ behaviour. Moreover, reporting model results in an accessible form (e.g. through relatable values or visualisation) is essential to build bridges between bicycle research and policymaking. Future research is encouraged to study cyclists’ route choice decisions from the perspective of objective well-being, quantifying and modelling the influence of factors such as safety, health, energy expenditure, or noise exposure.

Keywords

GPS, GPS data, analysis, attributes, behavior, behavior of cyclists, behavioral implications, bicycle, bicycle route choice, bicycle route choice model, bicycling research, bridge, categorisation, changes, characteristics, choice, choice behavior, choice decisions, choice model, choice preferences, commonalities, considerations, context, contextual, cyclist behavior, cyclists, data, decision, definition, effect, energy, energy expenditure, expenditure, exposure, factors, field, findings, health, implications, incorporating contextual, individual factors, individual information, influence, influence of factors, information, interaction, intersection, joint consideration, land, land use characteristics, local context, method, mode, model, model attributes, modes of transport, network, network factors, noise, noise exposure, objective well-being, perspective, policymakers, preferences, qualitative methods, quantitative model, research, results, review, route, route attributes, route choice, route choice behavior, route choice decisions, route choice model, route choice preferences, safety, statistical model, study, study w., transport, trips, unclear effects, use characteristics, utilitarian trips, well-being, years, years of research

Data Provider: Digital Science