Article, 2024

Multiple oppositions intervention: effective phonological treatment of two children with cleft lip and palate and severe speech sound disorder

Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, ISSN 1476-9670, 0269-9206, 1476-9689, 1464-5076, Volume ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print, Pages 1-22, 10.1080/02699206.2024.2339308

Contributors

Andersen, Helene Søgaard 0009-0008-4296-7371 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Jørgensen, Line Dahl 0000-0002-3698-5708 [3] [4] Wilstrup, Casper 0000-0002-1703-1650 [5] Willadsen, Elisabeth 0000-0001-9013-8764 [4] [6]

Affiliations

  1. [1] PPR, Rudersdal Municipality, Rudersdal, Denmark
  2. [NORA names: Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Rigshospitalet
  4. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] PPR, Roskilde Municipality, Roskilde, Denmark
  6. [NORA names: Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] University of Copenhagen
  8. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Abzu, Nordhavn, Denmark
  10. [NORA names: Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate if multiple oppositions intervention (MOI) generated widespread change in the phonological systems of two children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and severe speech sound disorders (SSD). We treated two children (ages 5;4 and 5;6) with CLP and severe SSD using MOI for 24 and 29 sessions. We measured the percentage consonants correct (PCC) for target consonants and untreated consonants in non-treatment single words, as well as PCC for connected speech. Data points were collected in the baseline, intervention, and maintenance phase with post-tests conducted immediately after intervention and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Two speech and language therapists (SLTs) unfamiliar with the children performed phonetic transcriptions, and we calculated intra- and inter-rater agreement. We graphed the data, and used permutation tests to analyse the probability that the observed increases in PCC were due to random chance. Both children experienced considerable improvements in PCC across all measures at the first post-test, supporting the impact of MOI on their entire phonological system. The PCC continued to increase during the maintenance phase. By the final post-test, the PCC in connected speech exceeded 90% for both children, reducing their SSD classification to mild. Our findings support that a phonological, contrastive intervention approach targeting multiple consonants simultaneously can create system-wide phonological change for children with CLP and severe SSD. Further research with more participants is needed to strengthen these findings.

Keywords

PCC, SLT, agreement, and, approach, baseline, calculated intra-, chance, changes, children, classification, cleft, cleft lip and, cleft lip and palate, connected speech, consonants, data, data points, disorders, findings, impact, improvement, increase, inter-rater agreement, intervention, intervention approaches, intra-, language, language therapists, lip and palate, maintenance, maintenance phase, measurements, months, multiple consonants, oppositional interventions, palate, participants, percentage, percentage consonants, permutation, permutation test, phase, phonetic transcription, phonological changes, phonological system, phonological treatment, point, post-test, probability, random chance, research, sessions, severe speech sound disorders, single words, sound disorders, speech, speech sound disorders, study, system, target, target consonants, test, therapists, transcription, treatment, words

Data Provider: Digital Science