open access publication

Article, 2024

Loud and unwanted: Individual differences in the tolerance for exposure to music

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, ISSN 1520-8524, 0001-4966, Volume 155, 5, Pages 3274-3282, 10.1121/10.0025924

Contributors

Carraturo, Giulio 0000-0002-2886-2564 [1] Kliuchko, Marina 0000-0002-4966-5535 [2] Brattico, Elvira 0000-0003-0676-6464 (Corresponding author) [1] [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Bari Aldo Moro
  2. [NORA names: Italy; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Technical University of Denmark
  4. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Royal Academy of Music
  6. [NORA names: The Royal Academy of Music - Aarhus/Aalborg; Artistic Higher Education Institutions; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Music is generally considered a pleasant and positive stimulus. However, constant exposure to loud music, especially in acoustic environments where individuals have limited control, can transform music listening into a potentially distressing and detrimental experience. In certain contexts, music can therefore be classified as noise, with implications for mental well-being and cognitive functioning. In our paper, we delve into the complexities of this paradoxical phenomenon, discussing the implications of commonly experienced situations in which music becomes a source of discomfort due to its intensity or forced exposure. Our exploration of the effects of music exposure focuses on individual differences, encompassing clinical sensitivity (hyperacusis, misophonia), non-clinical sensitivity (noise sensitivity, sensory-processing sensitivity), and music-related individual factors (sensitivity to music pleasure). We argue that only by recognizing these aspects, significant progress can be made in prevention strategies and interventions. Our aim is to identify regulatory gaps and propose strategies to mitigate potential music-related discomfort in order to promote the creation of auditory environments that align with individual preferences and sensitivities. This approach is particularly relevant when considering clinical and non-clinical populations, for whom sensory sensitivities may substantially influence the quality of life.

Keywords

acoustic environment, auditory environment, clinical sensitivity, cognitive function, complex, context, control, creation, detrimental experiences, differences, discomfort, effect, effects of music exposure, environment, experience situations, experiments, exploration, exposure, exposure to loud music, exposure to music, factors, forced exposure, function, gap, individual factors, individual preferences, individuals, intensity, intervention, life, listeners, loud music, mental well-being, music, music exposure, music listening, noise, non-clinical populations, paradoxical phenomenon, phenomenon, population, positive stimuli, preferences, prevention, prevention strategies, progression, quality, quality of life, regulatory gaps, sensitivity, sensory sensitivity, significant progress, situation, source, source of discomfort, stimuli, strategies, tolerance, well-being

Funders

  • Danish National Research Foundation
  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science