open access publication

Article, 2024

Emotions in engineering education: A configurative meta‐synthesis systematic review

Journal of Engineering Education, ISSN 1524-4873, 2168-9830, 1069-4730, 10.1002/jee.20600

Contributors

Lönngren, Johanna (Corresponding author) [1] Bellocchi, Alberto 0000-0003-4353-1517 [2] Berge, Maria 0000-0003-3614-1692 [1] Bøgelund, Pia 0000-0003-2908-9099 [3] Direito, Inês [4] [5] [6] Huff, James L 0000-0002-6693-5808 [6] [7] Mohd-Yusof, Khairiyah 0000-0002-4333-3396 [8] [9] Murzi, Homero G 0000-0003-3849-2947 [10] Rahman, Nor Farahwahidah Abdul 0000-0002-4376-9691 [9] Tormey, Roland 0000-0003-2502-9451 [11]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Umeå University
  2. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Queensland University of Technology
  4. [NORA names: Australia; Oceania; OECD];
  5. [3] Aalborg University
  6. [NORA names: AAU Aalborg University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] University College London
  8. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  9. [5] University of Aveiro
  10. [NORA names: Portugal; Europe, EU; OECD];

Abstract

Abstract Background The study of emotions in engineering education (EEE) has increased in recent years, but this emerging, multidisciplinary body of research is dispersed and not well consolidated. This paper reports on the first systematic review of EEE research and scholarship. Purpose The review aimed to critically assess how researchers and scholars in engineering education have conceptualized emotions and how those conceptualizations have been used to frame and conduct EEE research and scholarship. Scope/Method The systematic review followed the procedures of a configurative meta‐synthesis, mapping emotion theories and concepts, research purposes and methods, and citation patterns in the EEE literature. The review proceeded through five stages: (i) scoping and database searching; (ii) abstract screening, full text sifting, and full text review; (iii) pearling; (iv) scoping review, and (v) in‐depth analysis for the meta‐synthesis review. Two hundred and thirteen publications were included in the final analysis. Results The results show that the EEE literature has not extensively engaged with the wide range of conceptualizations of emotion available in the educational, psychological, and sociological literature. Further, the focus on emotion often seems to have been unintentional and of secondary importance in studies whose primary goals were to study other phenomena. Conclusions More research adopting intentional, theorized approaches to emotions will be crucial in further developing the field. To do justice to complex emotional phenomena in teaching and learning, future EEE research will also need to engage a broader range of conceptualizations of emotion and research methods, drawing on diverse disciplinary traditions.

Keywords

Pearl, SIFT, abstract screening, analysis, body of research, citation patterns, citations, complex emotional phenomena, concept, conceptualization, conceptualization of emotions, conceptualizing emotions, database, database search, disciplinary traditions, education, emotion theory, emotional phenomena, emotions, engineering, engineering education, engineering education literature, engineering education research, field, goal, importance, justice, learning, literature, meta-synthesis, meta-synthesis review, method, multidisciplinary body, multidisciplinary body of research, patterns, phenomenon, primary goal, procedure, publications, purposes, research, research method, research purposes, results, review, scholars, scholarship, scope, screening, search, secondary importance, sociological literature, stage, study, study of emotions, study other phenomena, systematic review, teaching, theory, tradition, years

Funders

  • Swedish Research Council
  • Directorate for Engineering
  • Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

Data Provider: Digital Science