open access publication

Article, 2024

Confused about Rehabilitation? Multi-Faceted Approaches for Brain Injured Patients in a Confusional State

Hospitals, ISSN 2813-4524, Volume 1, 1, Pages 50-64, 10.3390/hospitals1010005

Contributors

Fabricius, Jesper 0000-0001-7285-3422 [1] Andersen, Anna Birthe [1] LindegÄrd Munk, Gitte [1] Kaae Kristensen, Hanne [2] [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Regional Hospital Central Jutland
  2. [NORA names: Central Denmark Region; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University College Lillebaelt
  4. [NORA names: UCL University College; College; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] University of Southern Denmark
  6. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Post-injury confusional state is a common phenomenon following acquired brain injury. A multi-faceted approach for decreasing confusion is recommended, but there is a paucity of research related to non-pharmacological management. The main objective was to present a conceptual model of multi-faceted approaches for confusion, and secondly to investigate the rehabilitation outcome following these approaches. The setting is a specialized ward for rehabilitation of patients with severe cognitive difficulties following acquired brain injury. The conceptual model encompasses neurobehavioral strategies, pharmacological treatment, engagement in meaningful occupations, next of kin involvement, organizational demands, the physical environment, along with differential diagnostics. Patient cases are provided to illustrate the impact of each approach. A total of 141 of 281 patients were in a confusional state at admission. At discharge, 62% had emerged from the confusional state. Patients in a confusional state due to traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage had clinically important differences of >22 points in the functional independence measure from admission to discharge, following rehabilitation efforts based on the conceptual model. No clinically important difference was seen in patients with non-SAH stroke and patients with other types of brain injuries. The proposed conceptual model should be further evaluated in complex intervention studies.

Keywords

Confusional, Functional Independence Measure, Independence Measure, admission, approach, brain, brain injury, brain-injured patients, cases, clinic, clinically important difference, cognitive difficulties, complex intervention studies, conceptual model, confusion, confusional state, decrease confusion, demand, diagnostics, differences, differential diagnostics, difficulties, discharge, efforts, engagement, environment, hemorrhage, impact, important difference, injured patients, injury, intervention studies, involvement, kin, kin involvement, management, measurements, model, multi-faceted approach, non-pharmacological management, objective, occupation, organizational demands, outcomes, patient cases, patients, pharmacological treatment, phenomenon, physical environment, rehabilitation, rehabilitation efforts, rehabilitation of patients, rehabilitation outcomes, research, severe cognitive difficulties, special wards, state, strategies, stroke, study, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, treatment, ward

Data Provider: Digital Science