open access publication

Article, 2024

Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches

Bioresources and Bioprocessing, ISSN 2197-4365, Volume 11, 1, Page 47, 10.1186/s40643-024-00756-6

Contributors

Zhou, Mei [1] Taiwo, Kayode 0000-0001-7247-2048 [2] Wang, Han [1] Ntihuga, Jean Nepomuscene [1] Angenent, Largus T 0000-0003-0180-1865 [1] [3] [4] Usack, Joseph G 0000-0002-7859-4414 (Corresponding author) [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Tübingen
  2. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Georgia
  4. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  5. [3] Aarhus University
  6. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Max Planck Institute for Biology
  8. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD]

Abstract

Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary.Graphical Abstract

Keywords

AD inhibitor, AD microbiome, AD performance, AD process, AD treatment, N-heterocyclic compounds, O-heterocyclic compounds, acid, adsorption, ammonia nitrogen, anaerobic digestion, approach, area, biogas, biomass, carbon, catalog, components, composition, compounds, concentration, concentration of organic matter, conditions, detoxification, detoxification approaches, detoxification methods, digestion, effective approach, efficiency, evaluation approach, feedstock, feedstock composition, formation, granular activated carbon, hydrothermal treatment, hydrothermal treatment process, inhibition, inhibitors, integration, literature, matter, methane, methane yield, method, microaeration, microbiome, mitigation, mitigation strategies, nitrogen, organic acids, organic matter, organic removal efficiency, organic waste, organization, oxygenated organics, ozone, performance, precipitation, process, process water, processing conditions, recalcitrance, recalcitrant components, recalcitrant compounds, recovery, removal efficiency, research, resource recovery, resources, review, specific inhibitors, strategies, struvite precipitation, substances, technology, total ammonia nitrogen, toxic substances, toxicity, treatment, treatment process, waste, water, yield, zeolite, zeolite adsorption

Funders

  • China Scholarship Council
  • Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  • German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development

Data Provider: Digital Science