open access publication

Article, 2024

How to hit the allergy target: A critical appraisal of intralymphatic immunotherapy with practical recommendations on ultrasound‐guided injections

Allergy, ISSN 0001-5148, 1398-9995, 0105-4538, 10.1111/all.16138

Contributors

Flory, Stephan [1] Hviid-Vyff, Bjarke 0009-0001-1678-8985 [2] Šošić, Lara 0000-0002-9464-3562 [1] Schmid, Johannes Martin 0000-0002-4558-2943 [2] Ahlbeck, Lars 0000-0003-1745-6816 [3] Widmer, Emma C J [1] Lang, Claudia Cécile Valérie [4] Ikenberg, Kristian [4] Kündig, Thomas M 0000-0003-3863-8766 [1] [4] Hoffmann, Hans Jürgen Heinrich 0000-0002-6743-7931 [2] Johansen, Pål 0000-0002-5055-6299 (Corresponding author) [1] [4]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Zurich
  2. [NORA names: Switzerland; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Aarhus University
  4. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Linköping University Hospital
  6. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] University Hospital of Zurich
  8. [NORA names: Switzerland; Europe, Non-EU; OECD]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) represents a promising novel approach treating allergic diseases. However, no standardized procedures or recommendations have been established or reported, despite the recognized fact that treatment efficacy relies on the ability to inject the allergen intranodally. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a critical appraisal of ILIT as a method of allergen immunotherapy and to deliver practical recommendations for accurate ILIT. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three ILIT injections were performed in 28 (47%) women and 32 (53%) men with median age of 29 years (21-59). The injections were ultrasound-guided and recorded for retrospective analysis with respect to injection location, needle visibility, medication release, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The results show that the correct positioning of the needle within the lymph node (LN) was most critical. If the whole length of the needle bevel was not inserted into the LN, substance backflush into the interstitium was observed. Selecting a more superficial LN and inserting the needle at a smaller angle towards the LN significantly improved needle visibility in the ultrasound. Longitudinal results showed that continuous practice significantly correlated with improved needle visibility and more accurate ILIT injections. CONCLUSION: Based on our results and practical experience, we propose several recommendations for LN selection and the correct handling of ultrasound probe and needle. We are confident that ILIT standardization and training will be important as to meet the goals of good safety and efficacy of ILIT.

Keywords

LN selection, age, allergen immunotherapy, allergens, allergic diseases, allergy, analysis, angle, appraisal, bevel, characteristics, continuous practice, disease, efficacy, experiments, goal, handling, immunotherapy, injection, injection location, interstitium, intralymphatic immunotherapy, length, location, longitudinal results, lymph, lymph nodes, medication, medication release, men, method, needle, needle bevel, needle visibility, nodes, patient characteristics, patients, position, practice, practice recommendations, probe, procedure, recommendations, release, results, retrospective analysis, safety, selection, standard procedure, standards, substances, superficial LN, target, training, treat allergic diseases, treatment, treatment efficacy, ultrasound, ultrasound probe, ultrasound-guided, ultrasound-guided injection, visibility, women, years

Funders

  • Innovation Fund Denmark
  • University of Zurich

Data Provider: Digital Science