open access publication

Article, 2024

Once-weekly semaglutide versus placebo in adults with increased fracture risk: a randomised, double-blinded, two-centre, phase 2 trial

EClinicalMedicine, ISSN 2589-5370, Volume 72, Page 102624, 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102624

Contributors

Hansen, Morten Steen Svarer 0000-0001-8269-8542 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Wölfel, Eva M. [1] Jeromdesella, Shakespeare [1] [2] Møller, Jens-Jakob Kjer 0000-0002-8771-4940 [2] Ejersted, Charlotte Albjerg 0000-0002-3162-0793 [2] Jørgensen, Niklas R. [3] [4] Eastell, Richard Prof [5] Hansen, Stinus Gadegaard 0000-0001-9486-0316 [6] Frost, Morten 0000-0002-5608-1589 [1] [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Southern Denmark
  2. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Odense University Hospital
  4. [NORA names: Region of Southern Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Rigshospitalet
  6. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] University of Copenhagen
  8. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] University of Sheffield
  10. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have indicated that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) may enhance bone formation and have neutral or beneficial effects on fracture risk. We evaluated the effect of the GLP-1RA semaglutide on the bone formation marker Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) in adults with increased fracture risk. Methods: This randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at two public hospitals in Denmark. We enrolled 64 men and women with increased fracture risk based on a T-score < -1.0 at the total hip or lumbar spine and/or low-energy fracture within three years of recruitment. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg or placebo. The primary outcome was changes in plasma (P)-PINP from baseline to week 52. Primary and safety outcomes were assessed and evaluated for all participants. This trial is complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04702516. Findings: Between March 24 and December 8, 2021, 55 (86%) postmenopausal women and nine men with a mean age of 63 years (SD 5.5) and BMI of 27.5 kg/m2 (SD 4.5) were enrolled. There was no effect on changes in P-PINP from baseline to week 52 between the two groups (estimated treatment difference (ETD) semaglutide versus placebo 3.8 μg/L [95% CI -5.6 to 13.3]; p = 0.418), and no difference in P-PINP levels between groups at week 52 (semaglutide 64.3 μg/L versus placebo 62.3 μg/L [95% CI -10.8 to 15.0]; p = 0.749). The secondary outcomes showed higher plasma levels of bone resorption marker Collagen type I cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (P-CTX) in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (ETD 166.4 ng/L [95% CI 25.5-307.3]; p = 0.021). Compared to placebo, lumbar spine and total hip areal bone mineral densities (aBMD) were lower in the semaglutide group after 52 weeks ((ETD lumbar spine -0.018 g/cm3 [95% CI -0.031 to -0.005]; p = 0.007); ETD total hip -0.020 g/cm2 ([95% CI -0.032 to -0.008]; p = 0.001). Treatment differences in femoral neck aBMD were not observed ([95% CI [-0.017 to 0.006]; p = 0.328). Further, body weight was lower in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group after 52 weeks (ETD -6.8 kg [95% CI -8.8 to -4.7]; p < 0.001). Thirty-one [97%] in the semaglutide group and 18 [56%] in the placebo group experienced at least one adverse event, including four serious events (two in each group). No episodes of hypoglycaemia or deaths were reported. Interpretation: In adults with increased fracture risk, semaglutide once weekly did not increase bone formation based on the bone formation marker P-PINP. The observed increase in bone resorption in the semaglutide group may be explained by the accompanying weight loss. Funding: Region of Southern Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and Gangsted Foundation. Novo Nordisk provided the investigational drug and placebo.

Keywords

BMI, C-terminal telopeptide, Denmark, GLP-1RA, GLP-1RAs, P-CTX, SD, Secondary outcomes, T-score, adults, age, areal bone mineral density, baseline, baseline to week, bone, bone formation, bone formation marker procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, bone mineral density, changes, collagen type I, cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide, density, double-blind, effect, formation, fracture, fracture risk, glucagon-like peptide-1, group, hip, hip areal bone mineral density, hospital, increased fracture risk, levels, low-energy fractures, lumbar spine, men, mineral density, once-weekly semaglutide, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, outcomes, participants, peptide-1, phase, phase 2 clinical trial, phase 2 trial, placebo, placebo group, placebo-controlled, plasma, plasma levels, postmenopausal women, primary outcome, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, propeptide, public hospitals, recruitment, risk, safety, safety outcomes, semaglutide, semaglutide group, spine, study, subcutaneous semaglutide, telopeptide, total hip, total hip areal bone mineral density, trials, two-centre, type I, weeks, women, year of recruitment, years

Funders

  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark)

Data Provider: Digital Science