open access publication

Article, 2024

Reconfiguring European industry for net-zero: a qualitative review of hydrogen and carbon capture utilization and storage benefits and implementation challenges

Energy & Environmental Science, ISSN 1754-5706, 1754-5692, Volume 17, 10, Pages 3523-3569, 10.1039/d3ee03270a

Contributors

Sovacool, Benjamin Kenneth 0000-0002-4794-9403 [1] [2] [3] Del Rio, Dylan Furszyfer [2] Herman, Kyle S 0000-0002-0070-2390 [2] Iskandarova, Marfuga 0000-0001-8565-2830 [2] Uratani, Joao M 0000-0002-3579-7297 [4] Griffiths, Steve [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Aarhus University
  2. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Sussex
  4. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Boston University
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] Khalifa University of Science and Technology
  8. [NORA names: United Arab Emirates; Asia, Middle East]

Abstract

This paper explores the benefits, barriers, and justice impacts of industrial decarbonization via hydrogen and carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) via European industrial firms located in UK clusters. Based on a rich corpus of original mixed-methods research, this paper explores the benefits, barriers, and justice impacts of industrial decarbonization via hydrogen and carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) via European industrial firms located in UK clusters. It asks: (1) what are the technology dynamics and drivers of both hydrogen and CCUS in a real-world deployment context, including the state of deployment plans? (2) what are the possible benefits of CCUS and hydrogen deployment? (3) What are the most significant barriers and challenges facing CCUS and hydrogen implementation? (4) Who stands to “win” the most from deployment, who stands to “lose,” what possible inequitable community impacts could emerge, and what impact will deployment have on vulnerable groups? We offer answers to these four questions based on extensive semi-structured research interviews ( N = 111) triangulated with site visits to industrial clusters ( N = 52) as well as an extensive secondary review of the academic literature. We conclude with clear policy insights that are now prevalent across UK and European industrial clusters as well as emerging and context-specific recommendations concerning the adoption of hydrogen and CCUS to achieve net-zero industry globally.

Keywords

CCUS, European industry, UK, academic literature, adoption, adoption of hydrogen, answers, barriers, benefits, carbon, carbon capture utilization, challenges, clusters, community impact, corpus, decarbonization, deployment, deployment plan, drivers, dynamics, firms, group, hydrogen, hydrogen deployment, hydrogen implementation, impact, implementation, implementation challenges, industrial clusters, industrial decarbonization, industrial firms, industry, insights, interviews, justice, literature, mixed-methods research, net-zero, planning, policy, policy insights, qualitative review, questions, recommendations, research, research interviews, review, rich corpus, secondary review, semi-structured research interviews, significant barriers, site visits, state, storage, storage benefits, technological dynamics, technology, utilization, visits, vulnerable groups

Funders

  • UK Research and Innovation

Data Provider: Digital Science