open access publication

Article, 2024

Reliability and measurement error of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in pain-free adults and adults with musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review

Scandinavian Journal of Pain, ISSN 1877-8860, 1877-8879, Volume 24, 1, Page 20230104, 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0104

Contributors

Aron, Vladimir 0000-0003-2827-484X (Corresponding author) [1] Strul, David [2] Vaegter, Henrik Bjarke 0000-0002-7707-9947 [3] [4] Pitance, Laurent 0000-0002-5043-8946 [1] [5] Armijo-Olivo, Susan Luz 0000-0001-7942-433X [6] [7]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Université Catholique de Louvain
  2. [NORA names: Belgium; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Hôpitaux Iris Sud
  4. [NORA names: Belgium; Europe, EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Odense University Hospital
  6. [NORA names: Region of Southern Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] University of Southern Denmark
  8. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
  10. [NORA names: Belgium; Europe, EU; OECD];

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We systematically reviewed the reliability and measurement error of exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in pain-free adults and in adults with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, PUBMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PSYCINFO from inception to November 2021 (updated in February 2024). In addition, manual searches of the grey literature were conducted in March 2022, September 2023, and February 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adults - pain-free and with MSK pain - a single bout of exercise (any type) combined with experimental pre-post pain tests, and assessment of the reliability and/or measurement error of EIH. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, assessed their Risk of Bias (RoB) with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) RoB tool, and graded the individual results (COSMIN modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). RESULTS: We included five studies involving pain-free individuals (n = 168), which were deemed to have an overall "doubtful" RoB. No study including adults with MSK pain was found. The following ranges of parameters of reliability and measurement error of EIH were reported: intraclass correlation coefficients: 0-0.61; kappa: 0.01-0.46; standard error of measurement: 30.1-105 kPa and 10.4-21%; smallest detectable changes: 83.54-291.1 kPa and 28.83-58.21%. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded, with a very low level of certainty, that the reliability and measurement error of EIH is, in pain-free adults, respectively, "insufficient" and "indeterminate." Future studies should focus on people with MSK pain and could consider using tailored exercises, other test modalities than pressure pain threshold, rater/assessor blinding, and strict control of the sources of variations (e.g., participants' expectations).

Keywords

CINAHL, COnsensus-based, COnsensus-based Standards for the selection, COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, Embase, MSK, MSK pain, No study, PsycINFO, PubMed, RoB tool, RoB., Rob, Scopus, adults, assessment, blindness, bout of exercise, bouts, certainty, changes, coefficient, control, correlation coefficient, criteria, detect changes, error of measurement, exercise, exercise-induced hypoalgesia, grey literature, health Measurement INstruments, hypoalgesia, inception, inclusion, inclusion criteria, independent reviewers, individuals, instrument, intraclass correlation coefficient, kPa, level of certainty, levels, literature, manual search, measurement error, measurement instruments, measurements, modalities, musculoskeletal pain, pain, pain tests, pain threshold, pain-free, pain-free adults, pain-free individuals, parameters of reliability, people, pressure, pressure pain threshold, range, reliability, review, risk, search, selection of health Measurement INstruments, source, sources of variation, standard error, standard error of measurement, study, systematic review, tailored exercise, test, testing modalities, threshold, tools, variation

Funders

  • French Community of Belgium
  • Fund for Scientific Research

Data Provider: Digital Science