open access publication

Article, 2024

A participatory and comprehensive intervention to improve violence prevention in two high-risk occupations: effect and process evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial

BMC Public Health, ISSN 1471-2458, 1472-698x, Volume 24, 1, Page 1043, 10.1186/s12889-024-18527-5

Contributors

Andersen, Lars Peter Sønderbo 0000-0003-0320-7974 (Corresponding author) [1] Jaspers, Sofie Østergaard [2] Andersen, Dorte Raaby 0000-0002-1961-0891 [1] Karlsen, Iben Louise 0000-0002-7923-5800 [2] Aust, Birgit 0000-0002-4184-6577 [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Danish Ramazzini Center
  2. [NORA names: Other Hospitals; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] National Research Centre for the Working Environment
  4. [NORA names: NFA National Research Centre for the Working Environment; Governmental Institutions; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

BackgroundWork-related violence committed by clients, patients, and customers represents a major occupational health risk for employees that needs to be reduced.MethodsWe tested a comprehensive violence prevention intervention involving active participation of both employees and managers in the Prison and Probation Service (PPS) and on psychiatric wards in Denmark. We used a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial design. We measured the degree of implementation of the intervention by registration of fidelity, reach, and dose and used a mixed-effects regression analysis to estimate the effects of the intervention.ResultsWe recruited 16 work units for the intervention, but three work units dropped out. The average implementation rate was 73%. In the psychiatric wards, the intervention led to statistically significant improvements in the primary outcome (an increase in the degree to which managers and employees continuously work on violence prevention practices based on their registration and experiences), but none statistically significant improvements in any of the secondary outcomes. In the PPS units, the intervention did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome, but to statistically significant improvements in three secondary outcomes.ConclusionMost work units were able to carry out the intervention as planned. The intervention showed mixed results regarding the primary outcome. Nevertheless, the results indicate improvements also in the sector where a change in the primary outcome was not achieved. The results point at that a participatory and comprehensive approach could be a viable way of working with violence prevention in high-risk workplaces.Trial registrationISRCTN86993466: 20/12/2017

Keywords

ConclusionMost, Denmark, MethodsWe, PPS, ResultsWe, Secondary outcomes, active participation, analysis, approach, average implementation rate, changes, clients, cluster randomised controlled trial design, cluster randomised trial, comprehensive approach, comprehensive intervention, controlled trial design, customers, degree, degree of implementation, design, dose, effect, employees, evaluation, fidelity, health risks, high-risk occupations, high-risk workplaces, implementation, implementation rate, improvement, improving violence prevention, intervention, management, mixed-effects regression analysis, occupation, occupational health risks, outcomes, participants, participatory, patients, point, prevention, preventive interventions, primary outcome, prison, process, process evaluation, psychiatric wards, randomised controlled trial design, randomised trials, rate, registration, regression analysis, results, results point, risk, sector, significant improvement, statistically, statistically significant improvement, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial, trial design, trials, units, violence, violence prevention, violence prevention interventions, ward, work, work units, workplace

Funders

  • Danish Working Environment Authority

Data Provider: Digital Science