open access publication

Article, 2024

Symmetry classification of 2D materials: layer groups versus space groups

2D Materials, ISSN 2053-1583, Volume 11, 3, Page 035009, 10.1088/2053-1583/ad3e0c

Contributors

Fu, Jingheng [1] Kuisma, Mikael Juhani 0000-0001-8323-3405 [2] Larsen, Ask Hjorth 0000-0001-5267-6852 [2] Shinohara, Kohei 0000-0002-5907-2549 [3] Togo, Atsushi 0000-0001-8393-9766 [4] Thygesen, Kristian Sommer 0000-0001-5197-214X (Corresponding author) [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Tsinghua University
  2. [NORA names: China; Asia, East];
  3. [2] Technical University of Denmark
  4. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Kyoto University
  6. [NORA names: Japan; Asia, East; OECD];
  7. [4] National Institute for Materials Science
  8. [NORA names: Japan; Asia, East; OECD]

Abstract

The symmetry of a crystal structure with a three-dimensional (3D) lattice can be classified by one of the 230 space group types. For some types of crystals, e.g. crystalline films, surfaces, or planar interfaces, it is more appropriate to assume a two-dimensional (2D) lattice. With this assumption the structure can be classified by one of the 80 layer group types. We have implemented an algorithm to determine the layer group type of a 3D structure with a 2D lattice, and applied it to more than 15 000 monolayer structures in the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). We compare the classification of monolayers by layer groups and space groups, respectively. The latter is defined as the space group of the 3D bulk structure obtained by repeating the monolayer periodically in the direction perpendicular to the 2D lattice (AA-stacking). By this correspondence, nine pairs of layer group types are mapped to the same space group type due to the inability of the space group to distinguish the in-plane and out-of-plane axes. In total 18% of the monolayers in the C2DB belong to one of these layer group pairs and are thus not properly classified by the space group type. Our results show that symmetry classification of 2D materials should be based on layer groups rather than the commonly used space groups.

Keywords

AA stacking, C2DB, Computational 2D Materials Database, algorithm, axis, bulk structure, classification, computer, correspondence, crystal, crystal structure, crystalline films, database, direction, films, group, group pairs, group type, in-plane, inability, interface, lattice, layer, layer groups, material database, materials, monolayer, monolayer structure, out-of-plane axis, pairs, planar interface, results, space, space group, space group type, structure, surface, symmetry, symmetry classification, three-dimensional, two-dimensional, type

Funders

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • European Research Council
  • European Commission
  • The Velux Foundations

Data Provider: Digital Science