Article, 2024

Effective climate finance coordination? Stakeholder perceptions, climate change policy implementation and the underlying political economy factors in Kenya

Climate Policy, ISSN 1752-7457, 1469-3062, Volume ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print, Pages 1-15, 10.1080/14693062.2024.2335914

Contributors

Omala, Millicent Apiyo (Corresponding author) [1] Kioko, Eric Mutisya 0000-0002-7318-7609 [1] Gravesen, Marie Ladekjær 0000-0003-2376-9552 [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Kenyatta University
  2. [NORA names: Kenya; Africa];
  3. [2] Danish Institute for International Studies
  4. [NORA names: DIIS Danish Institute for International Studies; Governmental Institutions; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

The last two decades have seen an increase in climate financing channelled to the Global South from multiple sources, putting a spotlight on climate finance coordination challenges in recipient countries. However, the climate finance coordination debate has largely been centred at climate finance provision at the global level. Emerging literature has called on recipient countries to establish effective climate finance coordination mechanisms. Yet, the calls have not clarified what accounts for an effective coordination mechanism. This paper addresses the gap by analyzing stakeholder perceptions of effective climate finance coordination in Kenya. Kenya has instituted a legal and institutional framework to guide climate finance coordination, but challenges of coordination persist. Using the political economy framework, the paper analyzes political economy factors influencing stakeholder perceptions and climate change policy implementation to identify political contestations that need to be reconciled. Data is drawn from relevant literature, 29 key informant interviews and 4 focus group discussions at the national level in Nairobi and at the sub-national level in Turkana County. Deductive thematic analysis is adopted for coding and analyzing data. Results indicate that different ideologies, interests, incentives, politics, power relations and contestation over resources largely influence stakeholder perceptions of an effective climate finance coordination mechanism and climate policy implementation. The operationalization of the National Climate Change Council and the National Climate Change Fund are the most contested. The paper calls on policy actors to reconcile political issues of contention for recipient countries to institute coordination mechanisms that gain ownership and widespread legitimacy from stakeholders.

Keywords

Change Fund, Climate Change Fund, Council, County, Global, Global South, Kenya, Nairobi, National, South, Turkana, Turkana County, actors, analysis, analyzed data, calls, challenges, climate, climate change policy implementation, climate finance, climate policy implementation, contest, coordination, coordination challenges, coordination debate, coordination mechanism, countries, data, debates, decades, deductive thematic analysis, discussion, economy factors, economy framework, effective coordination mechanism, factors, finance, finance provision, focus, focus group discussions, framework, funding, gain ownership, gap, global level, group discussions, ideology, implementation, incentives, increase, influence stakeholder perceptions, informant interviews, information, institutional coordination mechanisms, institutional framework, interest, interviews, issues, legitimacy, levels, literature, mechanism, multiple sources, national level, operationalization, ownership, perception, policy, policy actors, policy implementation, political contestation, political economy factors, political economy framework, political issues, politics, power, power relations, provision, recipient countries, recipients, relations, relevant literature, resources, results, source, stakeholder perceptions, stakeholders, sub-national level, thematic analysis, widespread legitimacy

Funders

  • Danida Fellowship Centre

Data Provider: Digital Science