Comparing laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and visible near-infrared spectroscopy for predicting soil properties: A pan-European study

Soil organic carbon (SOC), texture, clay/organic carbon (OC) ratio, and extractable phosphorus are among the key soil descriptors representing the physical, chemical, and biological properties. However, analyzing these soil properties using conventional methods of analysis is time-consuming and often involves the use of hazardous chemicals. Therefore, scaling these methods to analyze more samples covering large geographical distributions within a reasonable turn-around time has become a challenge. In this study, two rapid techniques, namely laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and visible and near-infrared spectroscopy (vis-NIRS), were compared for the prediction of SOC, texture, extractable phosphorus, and clay/OC ratio. A total of 896 samples collected from 23 European countries from the Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS) database were used to represent a wide distribution in terms of soil texture and geographical coverage. The data was manually split into calibration and validation samples while ensuring a representative geographical distribution in the calibration and validation set for the selected samples. Partial least square regression (PLSR) models were developed for both LIBS and vis-NIRS and compared based on prediction accuracy. LIBS outperformed vis-NIRS in predicting SOC, sand content, and clay/OC ratio, with root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values of 1.79 %, 12 %, and 7.69, respectively. Conversely, vis-NIRS yielded slightly higher RMSEP values for SOC, sand content, and clay/OC ratio predictions at 1.88 %, 15 %, and 8.13, respectively. Both LIBS and vis-NIRS performed similarly in predicting clay content, with an RMSEP of 6 %. However, there was a low predictive ability for silt and phosphorus concentration, as shown by the weak correlations (R2 < 0.5) between the predicted and reference soil properties. There was no significant difference between LIBS and vis-NIRS predictions for clay, silt, and SOC content (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the predicted sand content (p = 0.011) and clay/OC ratio (p < 0.001). The overall better performance of LIBS highlights its potential for application in a wide range of soils, especially for soils covering large geographical distributions and varying soil properties. Further, both techniques present opportunities for rapid determination of soil properties important for evaluating soil health on continental scales.