Article, 2024
Considerations for Industry—Preparing for the FDA Model‐Informed Drug Development (MIDD) Paired Meeting Program
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics,
ISSN
1532-6535,
0009-9236,
Volume 116,
2,
Pages 282-288,
10.1002/cpt.3245
Contributors
Galluppi, Gerald R
[1]
Ahamadi, Malidi
[2]
Bhattacharya, Souvik
[3]
Budha, Nageshwar R
0009-0005-3373-657X
[4]
Gheyas, Ferdous
[5]
Li, Chi-Chung
0000-0002-9590-3450
[6]
Chen, Yuan
[6]
Dosne, Anne-Gaëlle
[7]
Kristensen, Niels Rode
0000-0001-8582-6298
[8]
Magee, Mindy He
[9]
Samtani, Mahesh N
[10]
Sinha, Vikram
[11]
Taskar, Kunal S
0000-0001-9979-8267
[12]
Upreti, Vijay V
0000-0003-1018-7166
[13]
Yang, Jianning
[14]
Cook, Jack
(Corresponding author)
[15]
Affiliations
- [1]
Sumitomo Pharma (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [2]
Sanofi (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [3]
Astellas Pharma US Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [4]
BeiGene (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [5]
MSD (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
(... more)
- [6]
Roche (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [7]
Janssen (Belgium)
[NORA names:
Belgium; Europe, EU; OECD];
- [8]
Novo Nordisk (Denmark)
[NORA names:
Novo Nordisk;
Private Research; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
- [9]
GlaxoSmithKline (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [10]
Johnson & Johnson (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [11]
Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research, Berwyn, Pennsylvania, USA
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [12]
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
[NORA names:
United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
- [13]
Amgen (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [14]
Astellas Pharma (United States)
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD];
- [15]
A2‐Ai LLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
[NORA names:
United States; America, North; OECD]
(less)
Abstract
A recent industry perspective published in this journal describes the benefits received by drug companies from participation in the MIDD Pilot Program. Along with the primary objectives of supporting good decision-making in drug development, there were substantial savings in time and development costs. Furthermore, many sponsors reported qualitative benefits such as new learnings and clarity on MIDD strategies and methodology that could be applied to other development programs. Based on the success of the Pilot Program, the FDA recently announced the continuation of the MIDD Paired Meeting Program as part of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VII). In this report, we describe the collective experiences of industry participants in the MIDD Program to date, including all aspects of the process from meeting request submission to follow-up actions. The purpose is to provide future participants with information to optimize the value of the MIDD Program.
Keywords
Act,
FDA,
Prescription Drug User Fee Act,
action,
benefits,
clarity,
companies,
considerations,
continuity,
cost,
decision-making,
development,
development costs,
development programs,
drug,
drug companies,
drug development,
experiments,
follow-up actions,
industrial perspective,
industry,
industry participants,
information,
journals,
learning,
meeting program,
methodology,
model-informed drug development,
objective,
pairs,
participants,
perspective,
pilot,
pilot program,
prescription,
primary objective,
process,
program,
purposes,
qualitative benefits,
reports,
sponsors,
strategies,
submission,
success,
time
Data Provider: Digital Science