open access publication

Article, 2024

Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP

Geoscientific Model Development, ISSN 1991-9603, 1991-959X, Volume 17, 6, Pages 2387-2417, 10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024

Contributors

Fiedler, Stephanie 0000-0001-8898-9949 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Naik, Vaishali 0000-0002-2254-1700 [3] O'Connor, Fiona M 0000-0003-2893-4828 [4] [5] Smith, Christopher J 0000-0003-0599-4633 [6] [7] Griffiths, Paul Thomas 0000-0002-1089-340X [8] Kramer, Ryan J 0000-0002-9377-0674 [3] [9] [10] Takemura, Toshihiko 0000-0002-2859-6067 [11] Allen, Robert J 0000-0003-1616-9719 [12] Im, Ulas 0000-0001-5177-5306 [13] [14] Kasoar, Matthew R 0000-0001-5571-8843 [15] Modak, Angshuman 0000-0002-6527-6142 [16] Turnock, Steven T 0000-0002-0036-4627 [5] [7] Voulgarakis, Apostolos E 0000-0002-6656-4437 [15] [17] Watson-Parris, Duncan Thomas Stephens 0000-0002-5312-4950 [18] [19] Westervelt, Daniel M [20] [21] Wilcox, Laura J 0000-0001-5691-1493 [22] Zhao, Alcide D 0000-0002-8300-5872 [22] Collins, William J 0000-0002-7419-0850 [22] Schulz, Michael 0000-0003-4493-4158 [23] Myhre, Gunnar [24] Forster, Piers Maxwell De Ferranti 0000-0002-6078-0171 [7]

Affiliations

  1. [1] GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
  2. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Kiel University
  4. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] University of Exeter
  8. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  9. [5] Met Office
  10. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];

Abstract

Abstract. The climate science community aims to improve our understanding of climate change due to anthropogenic influences on atmospheric composition and the Earth's surface. Yet not all climate interactions are fully understood, and uncertainty in climate model results persists, as assessed in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report. We synthesize current challenges and emphasize opportunities for advancing our understanding of the interactions between atmospheric composition, air quality, and climate change, as well as for quantifying model diversity. Our perspective is based on expert views from three multi-model intercomparison projects (MIPs) – the Precipitation Driver Response MIP (PDRMIP), the Aerosol Chemistry MIP (AerChemMIP), and the Radiative Forcing MIP (RFMIP). While there are many shared interests and specializations across the MIPs, they have their own scientific foci and specific approaches. The partial overlap between the MIPs proved useful for advancing the understanding of the perturbation–response paradigm through multi-model ensembles of Earth system models of varying complexity. We discuss the challenges of gaining insights from Earth system models that face computational and process representation limits and provide guidance from our lessons learned. Promising ideas to overcome some long-standing challenges in the near future are kilometer-scale experiments to better simulate circulation-dependent processes where it is possible and machine learning approaches where they are needed, e.g., for faster and better subgrid-scale parameterizations and pattern recognition in big data. New model constraints can arise from augmented observational products that leverage multiple datasets with machine learning approaches. Future MIPs can develop smart experiment protocols that strive towards an optimal trade-off between the resolution, complexity, and number of simulations and their length and, thereby, help to advance the understanding of climate change and its impacts.

Keywords

AerChemMIP, Assessment Report, Earth, Earth System Model, Earth's surface, IPCC, Intercomparison Project, Intergovernmental, Intergovernmental Panel, aerosol, air, air quality, anthropogenic influences, approach, assessment, atmospheric composition, big data, challenges, change progresses, changes, climate, climate change, climate change progresses, climate interactions, climate model results, climate science community, community, complex, composition, constraints, current challenges, data, dataset, diversity, ensemble of Earth system models, experiment protocol, experiments, expert views, focus, future, guidance, impact, influence, interaction, interest, learning approach, length, leverage multiple datasets, limitations, machine, machine learning approach, model, model constraints, model diversity, model results, multi-model ensemble, multiple datasets, near future, observed product, opportunities, optimal trade-off, overlap, panel, paradigm, parameterization, partial overlap, pattern recognition, patterns, perspective, precipitation, process, production, progression, project, protocol, quality, quantify model diversity, radiation, recognition, reports, representational limits, resolution, results, science community, scientific focus, simulation, specialization, subgrid-scale parameterizations, surface, system model, trade-offs, uncertainty, views

Funders

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • Met Office
  • European Research Council
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • The Research Council of Norway
  • National Centre for Atmospheric Science
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Official Development Assistance
  • European Commission
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Data Provider: Digital Science