open access publication

Article, 2024

Anaerobic digestion of wastewater from hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge and combined wheat straw-manure

Bioresource Technology, ISSN 0960-8524, 1873-2976, Volume 399, Page 130559, 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130559

Contributors

Macêdo, Williane Vieira 0000-0003-0826-3086 (Corresponding author) [1] Harpøth, Rune Dall [2] Poulsen, Jan Struckmann 0000-0003-1841-4028 [3] De Jonge, Nadieh 0000-0003-0891-0837 [3] Fischer, Christian Holst [2] Agneessens, Laura Mia [2] Nielsen, Jeppe Lund 0000-0002-8747-6938 [3] Biller, Patrick 0000-0003-2982-6095 [1] Rickers, Caroline Kragelund [2] Vergeynst, Leendert Patrick I 0000-0002-4388-4315 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Aarhus University
  2. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Danish Technological Institute
  4. [NORA names: Danish Technological Institute; GTS Institutes; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Aalborg University
  6. [NORA names: AAU Aalborg University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) shows promise for converting wet biomass waste into biofuel, but the resulting high-strength process water (PW) requires treatment. This study explored enhancing energy recovery by anaerobic digestion using semi-batch reactors. Co-digesting manure with HTL-PW from wheat straw-manure co-HTL yielded methane (43-49% of the chemical oxygen demand, COD) at concentrations up to 17.8 gCOD·L-1, whereas HTL-PW from sewage sludge yielded methane (43% of the COD) up to only 12.8 gCOD·L-1 and complete inhibition occurred at 17 gCOD·L-1. Microbial community shifts confirmed inhibition of methanogenic archaea, while hydrolytic-fermentative bacteria were resilient. Differences in chemical composition, particularly higher levels of N-containing heterocyclic compounds in PW of sewage sludge, likely caused the microbial inhibition. The considerable potential of combining HTL with anaerobic digestion for enhanced energy recovery from straw-manure in an agricultural context is demonstrated, yet sewage sludge HTL-PW requires more advanced approaches to deal with methanogenesis inhibitors.

Keywords

N-containing heterocyclic compounds, advanced approach, agricultural context, anaerobic digestion, anaerobic digestion of wastewater, approach, archaea, bacteria, biofuels, biomass waste, chemical composition, co-HTL, co-digesting manure, community shifts, complete inhibition, composition, compounds, concentration, context, differences, digestion, energy recovery, enhanced energy recovery, heterocyclic compounds, hydrothermal liquefaction, hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge, inhibition, inhibitors, levels, liquefaction, liquefaction of sewage sludge, manure, methane, methanogenesis, methanogenesis inhibitor, methanogenic archaea, microbial community shifts, microbial inhibition, potential, process water, reactor, recovery, semi-batch reactor, sewage, sewage sludge, shift, sludge, straw manure, study, treatment, waste, wastewater, water, wet biomass waste, wheat

Funders

  • European Research Council
  • European Union
  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science