open access publication

Article, 2024

Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study

JMIR Research Protocols, ISSN 1929-0748, Volume 13, Page e52766, 10.2196/52766

Contributors

Torbjørnsen, Astrid 0000-0003-2385-2452 (Corresponding author) [1] Spildo, Ingeborg [1] Mollestad, Maria Aadland [1] Jensen, Annesofie Lunde 0000-0003-2025-6663 [2] [3] Singstad, Tone [4] Weldingh, Nina Mickelson [4] Joranger, Pål [1] Ribu, Lis 0000-0003-1850-7902 [1] Holmen, Heidi 0000-0003-1314-7813 [1] [5]

Affiliations

  1. [1] OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
  2. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Aarhus University
  4. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Aarhus University Hospital
  6. [NORA names: Central Denmark Region; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Akershus University Hospital
  8. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Oslo University Hospital
  10. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging, and to support self-management, repeated consultations in specialist outpatient care are often required. The emergence of new digital solutions has revolutionized how health care services can be patient centered, providing unprecedented opportunities for flexible, high-quality care. However, there is a lack of studies exploring how the use of digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for flexible specialist care affects diabetes self-management. To provide new knowledge on the relevance of using PROMs in standard care, we have designed a multimethod prospective study. OBJECTIVE: The overall aim of this protocol is to describe our prospective multimethod observational study designed to investigate digital PROMs in a routine specialist outpatient setting for flexible patient-centered diabetes care (DigiDiaS). METHODS: This protocol outlines the design of a multimethod prospective observational cohort study that includes data from electronic health records, self-reported questionnaires, clinical consultation field observations, and individual in-depth interviews with patients and diabetes health care personnel. All patients with type 1 diabetes at a designated outpatient clinic were invited to participate and use the digital PROM implemented in clinical care. Both users and nonusers of the digital PROM were eligible for the prospective study, allowing for a comparison of the two groups. Data were collected at baseline and after 12 months, including self-management as the primary outcome assessed using the Patient Activation Measure, along with the secondary outcomes of digital health literacy, quality of life, health economy, and clinical variables such as glycated hemoglobin. RESULTS: The digital solution was implemented for routine clinical care in the department in November 2021, and data collection for the prospective study started in October 2022. As of September 6, 2023, 84.6% (186/220) of patients among those in the digital PROM and 15.5% (34/220) of patients among the nonusers have consented to participate. We expect the study to have enough participants by the autumn of 2023. With 1 year of follow-up, the results are expected by spring 2025. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a multimethod prospective observational cohort study can offer valuable insights into the relevance, effectiveness, and acceptability of digital tools using PROMs in diabetes specialist care. Such knowledge is crucial for achieving broad and successful implementation and use of these tools in a large diabetes outpatient clinic. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52766.

Keywords

DERR1, INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER, International, Patient Activation Measure, Secondary outcomes, acceptance, acceptance of digital tools, activity measurements, autumn, baseline, care, care personnel, care services, clinic, clinical care, clinical variables, cohort study, collection, comparison, consultation, data, data collection, department, design, diabetes, diabetes care, diabetes outpatient clinic, diabetes self-management, digital health literacy, digital solutions, digital tools, economy, effect, electronic health records, emergency, field observations, follow-up, glycated hemoglobin, group, health, health care personnel, health care services, health economy, health literacy, health records, hemoglobin, high-quality care, identifiers, implementation, knowledge, lack, lack of studies, life, literacy, measurements, months, multimethod, nonusers, observational cohort study, observational study, observations, opportunities, outcome measures, outcomes, outpatient care, outpatient clinic, outpatient setting, participants, patient-centered diabetes care, patient-reported outcome measures, patients, personnel, primary outcome, prospective observational cohort study, prospective observational study, prospective study, protocol, quality, quality of life, questionnaire, records, relevance, results, self-management, self-report questionnaires, services, sets, solution, specialist care, specialist outpatient care, specialist outpatient setting, specialists, spring, standard care, study, tools, type, type 1 diabetes, users, variables, years, years of follow-up

Data Provider: Digital Science