open access publication

Preprint, 2024

Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods

medRxiv, Page 2024.02.27.24303078, 10.1101/2024.02.27.24303078

Contributors

Romascano, David 0000-0002-8823-9176 [1] [2] Rebsamen, Michael 0000-0002-8441-1485 [2] Radojewski, Piotr [2] [3] Blattner, Timo [2] Mckinley, Richard Iain 0000-0001-8250-6117 [2] Wiest, Roland 0000-0001-7030-2045 [2] [3] Rummel, Christian 0000-0003-2345-7938 (Corresponding author) [2] [4]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Amager and Hvidovre Hospital
  2. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University Hospital of Bern
  4. [NORA names: Switzerland; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Translational Imaging Center (TIC), Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, sitem-insel, Bern, Switzerland
  6. [NORA names: Switzerland; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  7. [4] Deggendorf Institute of Technology
  8. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD]

Abstract

Abstract Over the past decades, morphometric analysis of brain MRI has contributed substantially to the understanding of healthy brain structure, development and aging as well as to improved characterisation of disease related pathologies. Certified commercial tools based on normative modeling of these metrics are meanwhile available for diagnostic purposes, but they are cost intensive and their clinical evaluation is still in its infancy. Here we have compared the performance of “ScanOMetrics”, an open-source research-level tool for detection of statistical anomalies in individual MRI scans, depending on whether it is operated on the output of FreeSurfer or of the deep learning based brain morphometry tool DL+DiReCT. When applied to the public OASIS3 dataset, containing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC), cortical thickness anomalies in patient scans were mainly detected in regions that are known as predilection areas of cortical atrophy in AD, regardless of the software used for extraction of the metrics. By contrast, anomaly detections in HCs were up to twenty-fold reduced and spatially unspecific using both DL+DiReCT and FreeSurfer. Progression of the atrophy pattern with clinical dementia rating (CDR) was clearly observable with both methods. DL+DiReCT provided results in less than 25 minutes, more than 15 times faster than FreeSurfer. This difference in computation time might be relevant when considering application of this or similar methodology as diagnostic decision support for neuroradiologists.

Keywords

Abstract, Alzheimer, Alzheimer's disease, Clinical Dementia Rating, DL+DiReCT, Dementia Rating, FreeSurfer, MRI, MRI scans, age, analysis of brain MRI, anomalies, anomaly detection, applications, area, atrophy, atrophy patterns, brain, brain MRI, brain structures, characterisation, clinical evaluation, commercial tools, comparison, computation time, computer, control, cortical atrophy, cortical thickness, dataset, decades, decision support, deep learning, detection, development, diagnostic decision support, diagnostic purposes, disease, evaluation, extraction, healthy brain structures, healthy controls, individual MRI scans, infancy, learning, method, methodology, metrics, minutes, model, morphometric analysis, neuroradiologists, normative model, output, pathology, patient scans, patients, patterns, performance, predilection areas, progression, purposes, rate, region, related pathologies, results, scanning, software, statistical anomalies, structure, support, thickness, thickness anomalies, time, tools, volume anomaly detection

Funders

  • Swiss National Science Foundation

Data Provider: Digital Science