open access publication

Article, 2024

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of once‐weekly insulin icodec in individuals with type 1 diabetes

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, ISSN 1463-1326, 1462-8902, Volume 26, 5, Pages 1941-1949, 10.1111/dom.15510

Contributors

Hövelmann, Ulrike (Corresponding author) [1] Engberg, Susanne 0000-0003-1884-3455 [2] Heise, Tim [1] Kristensen, Niels Rode 0000-0001-8582-6298 [2] Nørgreen, Lea [2] Zijlstra, Eric [1] Ribel-Madsen, Rasmus [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Profil Institute for Metabolic Research
  2. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Novo Nordisk (Denmark)
  4. [NORA names: Novo Nordisk; Private Research; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of once-weekly insulin icodec in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, two-period crossover trial, 66 individuals with T1D (age 18-64 years; glycated haemoglobin ≤75 mmol/mol [≤ 9%]) were to receive once-weekly icodec (8 weeks) and once-daily insulin glargine U100 (2 weeks) at individualized fixed equimolar total weekly doses established during up to 10 weeks' run-in with glargine U100 titrated to pre-breakfast plasma glucose (PG) of 4.4-7.2 mmol/L (80-130 mg/dL). Insulin aspart was used as bolus insulin. Blood sampling for icodec pharmacokinetics was performed from the first icodec dose until 35 days after the last dose. The glucose infusion rate at steady state was assessed in glucose clamps (target 6.7 mmol/L [120 mg/dL]) at 16-52 h and 138-168 h after the last icodec dose and 0-24 h after the last glargine U100 dose. Icodec pharmacodynamics during 1 week were predicted by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling. Hypoglycaemia was recorded during the treatment periods based on self-measured PG. RESULTS: Icodec reached pharmacokinetic steady state on average within 2-3 weeks. At steady state, model-predicted daily proportions of glucose infusion rate during the 1-week dosing interval were 14.3%, 19.6%, 18.3%, 15.7%, 13.1%, 10.6% and 8.4%, respectively. Rates and duration of Level 2 hypoglycaemic episodes (PG <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) were 32.8 versus 23.9 episodes per participant-year of exposure and 33 ± 25 versus 30 ± 18 min (mean ± SD) for icodec versus glargine U100. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of icodec suggest its potential to provide basal coverage in a basal-bolus insulin regimen in people with T1D.

Keywords

T1D, U100, aspartate, average, basal coverage, basal-bolus insulin regimen, blood, blood samples, bolus, bolus insulin, clamp, coverage, days, dose, dosing interval, duration, episodes, exposure, glargine, glargine U100, glucose, glucose clamp, glucose infusion rate, hypoglycaemia, icodec, individuals, infusion rate, insulin, insulin aspart, insulin glargine U100, insulin icodec, insulin regimens, interval, model, open-label, people, period, pharmacodynamic properties, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetic steady state, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, pharmacokinetics, plasma glucose, potential, properties, proportion, rate, regimens, run-in, samples, state, steady state, treatment, treatment period, type, type 1 diabetes, weekly doses, weeks

Funders

  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark)

Data Provider: Digital Science