open access publication

Article, 2024

Risk and protective factors for self-harm thoughts and behaviours in transgender and gender diverse people: A systematic review

Heliyon, ISSN 1879-4378, 2405-7843, 2405-8440, Volume 10, 5, Page e26074, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26074

Contributors

Bird, Katherine 0000-0002-1749-1673 (Corresponding author) [1] Arcelus, Jon 0000-0002-3805-0180 [1] [2] Matsagoura, L. [1] O'Shea, B.A. [1] [3] [4] Townsend, Ellen 0000-0002-4677-5958 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Nottingham
  2. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge
  4. [NORA names: Spain; Europe, EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Aarhus University
  6. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Harvard University
  8. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD]

Abstract

Background: Self-harm (any self-injury or -poisoning regardless of intent) is highly prevalent in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations. It is strongly associated with various adverse health and wellbeing outcomes, including suicide. Despite increased risk, TGD individuals' unique self-harm pathways are not well understood. Following PRISMA guidelines we conducted the first systematic review of risk and protective factors for self-harm in TGD people to identify targets for prevention and intervention. Methods: We searched five electronic databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Web of Science) published from database inception to November 2023 for primary and secondary studies of risk and/or protective factors for self-harm thoughts and behaviours in TGD people. Data was extracted and study quality assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scales. Findings: Overall, 78 studies published between 2007 and 2023 from 16 countries (N = 322,144) were eligible for inclusion. Narrative analysis identified six key risk factors for self-harm in TGD people (aged 7-98years) were identified. These are younger age, being assigned female at birth, illicit drug and alcohol use, sexual and physical assault, gender minority stressors (especially discrimination and victimisation), and depression or depressive symptomology. Three important protective factors were identified: social support, connectedness, and school safety. Other possible unique TGD protective factors against self-harm included: chosen name use, gender-identity concordant documentation, and protective state policies. Some evidence of publication bias regarding sample size, non-responders, and confounding variables was identified. Interpretation: This systematic review indicates TGD people may experience a unique self-harm pathway. Importantly, the risk and protective factors we identified provide meaningful targets for intervention. TGD youth and those assigned female at birth are at increased risk. Encouraging TGD people to utilise and foster existing support networks, family/parent and peer support groups, and creating safe, supportive school environments may be critical for self-harm and suicide prevention strategies. Efforts to reduce drug and alcohol use and experiences of gender-based victimisation and discrimination are recommended to reduce self-harm in this high-risk group. Addressing depressive symptoms may reduce gender dysphoria and self-harm. The new evidence presented in this systematic review also indicates TGD people may experience unique pathways to self-harm related to the lack of social acceptance of their gender identity. However, robust longitudinal research which examines gender-specific factors is now necessary to establish this pathway.

Keywords

Newcastle-Ottawa, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, PRISMA, PRISMA guidelines, TGD, TGD people, TGD youth, acceptance, adverse health, age, alcohol, alcohol use, analysis, assault, behavior, bias, birth, concordance document, confounding, confounding variables, connectedness, countries, data, database, database inception, depression, depressive symptomology, depressive symptoms, discrimination, diverse people, documents, drug, dysphoria, electronic databases, environment, evidence, evidence of publication bias, experiments, factors, family/parenting, females, gender, gender diverse people, gender dysphoria, gender identity, gender minority stressors, gender-specific factors, group, guidelines, health, high-risk group, identity, illicit, illicit drugs, inception, inclusion, increased risk, intervention, lack, lack of social acceptance, longitudinal research, minority stressors, narrative analysis, network, non-responders, outcomes, pathway, pathways to self-harm, peer, peer support groups, people, physical assault, policy, population, prevention, prevention strategies, protective factors, publication bias, quality, reduce self-harm, reducing drug, research, review, review of risk, risk, risk factors, robust longitudinal research, safety, sample size, samples, scale, school, school environment, school safety, self-harm, self-harm thoughts, size, social acceptance, social support, state policy, strategies, stressors, study, study quality, suicide, suicide prevention strategies, support, support groups, supportive school environment, symptomology, symptoms, systematic review, target, thoughts, transgender, use, variables, victimisation, wellbeing, wellbeing outcomes, younger age, youth

Funders

  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Medical Research Council
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council

Data Provider: Digital Science