Article, 2024

I think they just logged on and fell asleep: Challenges to facilitating creativity online in higher engineering education

Creativity and Innovation Management, ISSN 1467-8691, 0963-1690, 10.1111/caim.12599

Contributors

Wolf, Patricia 0000-0002-1242-6514 (Corresponding author) [1] Cormican, Kathryn T 0000-0003-1688-1087 [2] Frederiksen, Marianne Harbo 0000-0002-1518-7416 [1] Wilhøft, Andreas [1] Ulus, Hüseyin Ekrem 0000-0002-0310-6455 [3] Kunz, Christoph 0000-0002-0556-0301 [4] Andiç-Çakır, Özge 0000-0001-5662-3555 [3] Sarsar, Fırat 0000-0002-3611-8137 [3] Van Leeuwen, Manon 0000-0002-6241-292X [5]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Southern Denmark
  2. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Galway
  4. [NORA names: Ireland; Europe, EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Ege University
  6. [NORA names: Turkey; Asia, Middle East; OECD];
  7. [4] Stuttgart Media University
  8. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  9. [5] EOLAS S.L., Badajoz, Spain
  10. [NORA names: Spain; Europe, EU; OECD]

Abstract

Creativity is a crucial skill for future engineers. Hence, it is becoming increasingly important for higher education (HE) engineering educators to foster and enhance engineering students' creative abilities. Simultaneously, online learning has found a place in engineering education. Nevertheless, we find that HE engineering educators in all domains continue to express a sense of inadequacy when it comes to fostering creativity in hybrid and online learning environments. This sentiment persists despite the existence of scholarly work that suggests strategies for addressing these challenges. In this paper, we assume that the rationale behind this is that the proposed pedagogical approaches are primarily established through conceptual reflections, whereas the perspective of the HE engineering educators on the perceived barriers has thus far been largely neglected. Therefore, we present a study that uses data from experience interviews and focus group techniques involving 71 HE engineering educators from Ireland, Germany, Denmark and Turkey to identify the common challenges that HE engineering educators perceive when facilitating creativity in online and hybrid classroom environments. These are used to extend theory by developing a four‐field conceptual model organizing the eight overarching challenges encountered. This model can be used as a basis for defining measures to support HE engineering educators in facilitating creativity online and serves as a guide for future research studies.

Keywords

Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Turkey, ability, approach, barriers, classroom, classroom environment, conceptual reflection, creative abilities, creativity, data, domain, education, engineering, engineering education, environment, focus group technique, fostering creativity, future engineers, group technique, higher education, hybrid, inadequacy, interviews, learning, measurements, model, online learning, pedagogical approach, perceived barriers, perspective, reflection, research, research studies, scholarly work, sentiment, skills, students' creative abilities, study, technique, theory, work

Data Provider: Digital Science