Article, 2024

Using digital phenotyping to classify bipolar disorder and unipolar disorder – exploratory findings using machine learning models

European Neuropsychopharmacology, ISSN 1873-7862, 0924-977X, Volume 81, Pages 12-19, 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.01.003

Contributors

Faurholt-Jepsen, Maria 0000-0002-0462-6444 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Rohani, Darius Adam 0000-0003-2529-3818 [3] Busk, Jonas [4] Tønning, Morten Lindberg [1] Frost, Mads M [5] Bardram, Jakob Eyvind 0000-0003-1390-8758 [4] Kessing, Lars Veddel 0000-0001-9377-9436 [1] [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Mental Health Services
  2. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Copenhagen
  4. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Kuatro Group Aps, Nannasgade 28, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  6. [NORA names: Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Technical University of Denmark
  8. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Monsenso A/S, Ny Carlsberg Vej 80, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  10. [NORA names: Other Companies; Private Research; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

The aims were to investigate 1) differences in smartphone-based data on phone usage between bipolar disorder (BD) and unipolar disorder (UD) and 2) by using machine learning models, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the combined smartphone data in classifying BD and UD. Daily smartphone-based self-assessments of mood and same-time passively collected smartphone data on smartphone usage was available for six months. A total of 64 patients with BD and 74 patients with UD were included. Patients with BD during euthymic states compared with UD in euthymic states had a lower number of incoming phone calls/ day (B: -0.70, 95%CI: -1.37; -0.70, p=0.040). Patients with BD during depressive states had a lower number of incoming and outgoing phone calls/ day as compared with patients with UD in depressive states. In classification by using machine learning models, 1) overall (regardless of the affective state), patients with BD were classified with an AUC of 0.84, which reduced to 0.48 when using a leave-one-patient-out crossvalidation (LOOCV) approach; similarly 2) during a depressive state, patients with BD were classified with an AUC of 0.86, which reduced to 0.42 with LOOCV; 3) during a euthymic state, patients with BD were classified with an AUC of 0.87, which reduced to 0.46 with LOOCV. While digital phenotyping shows promise in differentiating between patients with BD and UD, it highlights the challenge of generalizing to unseen individuals. It should serve as an complement to comprehensive clinical evaluation by clinicians.

Keywords

AUC, bipolar disorder, classification, classifying BD, clinical evaluation, clinicians, comprehensive clinical evaluation, crossvalidation, data, days, depressive state, differences, digital phenotyping, disorders, euthymic state, evaluation, exploratory findings, findings, income, individuals, investigate 1, learning models, machine, machine learning models, model, months, mood, overall, patients, phenotype, phone, phone usage, same-time, self-assessment, self-assessment of mood, sensitivity, smartphone, smartphone data, smartphone usage, smartphone-based data, specificity, state, unipolar disorder, usage

Funders

  • Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education
  • Innovation Fund Denmark

Data Provider: Digital Science