open access publication

Article, 2024

What consumers want in a sustainability food label: Results from online co-creation workshops in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark

Frontiers in Sustainability, ISSN 2673-4524, Volume 4, Page 1342215, 10.3389/frsus.2023.1342215

Contributors

Pedersen, Susanne 0000-0002-8730-5442 (Corresponding author) [1] Benson, Tony [2] Tsalis, George 0000-0003-2155-5593 [1] Futtrup, Rebecca [3] Dean, Moira 0000-0002-9014-1266 [2] Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica 0000-0002-6737-3659 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Aarhus University
  2. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Queen's University Belfast
  4. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Technical University of Denmark
  6. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Changes in consumers’ decision-making relating to food play an important role in the sustainable transition of the food system. However, assessing sustainability across choice alternatives is complex. A holistic or multi-dimensional ‘summary’ sustainability label for food could help consumers make more informed choices, but it is important that such a label is developed taking consumers’ perception and understanding of sustainability into consideration. Hence, it is necessary to understand consumers’ needs and wants in a sustainability food label. The objective of this study is therefore to explore in-depth consumer perceptions and preferences for sustainability as a concept in food production as well as for a sustainability label for food. A total of six online co-creation workshops were carried out in the UK and Ireland (3 groups, n = 24) and Denmark (3 groups, n = 21) using an interactive platform, where participants over the course of two weeks discussed and engaged in creative tasks related to food and sustainability. Results show that consumers in lack information about the sustainability of food products. There were differences with regards to which of 10 pre-tested indicators of sustainability (nature preservation, climate change, animal welfare, fair wages, biodiversity, pollution, health, equality, economic growth and culture) were perceived as most important. The information participants discussed as relevant for a sustainability label included transportation, the degree of processing, and packaging, with some country differences. Consumers acknowledged the complexity of designing and understanding a sustainability food label and existing nutrition labels served as inspiration for creating a sustainability label. Consumers recommended more responsibility to be taken by retailers and food producers through public information campaigns to create awareness. Pros and cons of co-creating a sustainability label with consumers online are discussed as well as the implications for consumers, the food industry and policy makers.

Keywords

Con, Denmark, Ireland, Kingdom, UK, United Kingdom, alternative, awareness, campaign, changes, choice, choice alternatives, co-creation workshops, complex, concept, consumer needs, consumer perceptions, consumers, countries, country differences, course, creative tasks, decision-making, degree, degree of processing, differences, food, food industry, food labels, food producers, food products, food systems, indicators of sustainability, industry, informal participation, information, information campaigns, informed choice, inspiration, interactive platform, labeling, lack, lack information, makers, needs, nutrition, nutrition labels, objective, package, participants, perception, platform, policy, policy makers, preferences, process, producers, production, pros, public information campaigns, response, results, retailers, study, sustainability, sustainability labels, sustainability of food production, system, task, transition, transport, units, weeks, workshop

Funders

  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science