open access publication

Article, 2024

Methylated Cell-Free Tumor DNA in Sputum as a Tool for Diagnosing Lung Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers, ISSN 2072-6694, Volume 16, 3, Page 506, 10.3390/cancers16030506

Contributors

Wen, Sara Witting Christensen (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Borg, Morten Hornemann 0000-0002-6204-2623 [1] Timm, Signe 0000-0002-5862-7784 [1] [2] Hansen, Torben Frøstrup 0000-0001-7476-671X [1] [2] Hilberg, Ole 0000-0002-3075-3463 [1] [2] Andersen, Rikke Fredslund 0000-0002-5894-7745 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Vejle Sygehus
  2. [NORA names: Region of Southern Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Southern Denmark
  4. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis is pivotal for the prognosis. There is a notable overlap between lung cancer and chronic bronchitis, and the potential use of methylated tumor DNA in sputum as a biomarker for lung cancer detection is appealing. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, using these search strings: Lung cancer, sputum, and methylated tumor DNA. A total of 15 studies met the eligibility criteria. Studies predominantly utilized a case-control design, with sensitivity ranging from 10 to 93% and specificity from 8 to 100%. A meta-analysis of all genes across studies resulted in a summary sensitivity of 54.3% (95% CI 49.4-59.2%) and specificity of 79.7% (95% CI 75.0-83.7%). Notably, two less explored genes (TAC1, SOX17) demonstrated sensitivity levels surpassing 85%. The study's findings highlight substantial variations in the sensitivity and specificity of methylated tumor DNA in sputum for lung cancer detection. Challenges in reproducibility could stem from differences in tumor site, sample acquisition, extraction methods, and methylation measurement techniques. This meta-analysis provides a foundation for prioritizing high-performing genes, calling for a standardization and refinement of methodologies before potential application in clinical trials.

Keywords

Cochrane, Cochrane Library, DNA, Embase, MEDLINE, PRISMA, Web, Web of Science, acquisition, applications, biomarkers, bronchitis, cancer, cancer detection, cancer-related mortality, case-control design, cell-free tumor DNA, challenges, chronic bronchitis, clinical trials, comprehensive search, criteria, design, detection, diagnosis, differences, early diagnosis, eligibility, eligibility criteria, extraction, extraction method, findings, genes, levels, library, lung, lung cancer, lung cancer detection, measurement techniques, meta-analysis, method, methodology, methylation, mortality, overlap, potential applications, potential use, prognosis, refinement, refinement of methodology, reproducibility, review, sample acquisition, samples, science, search, sensitivity, sensitivity level, sites, specificity, sputum, standards, statements, study, study findings, systematic review, technique, tools, trials, tumor, tumor DNA, tumor site, use, variation

Funders

  • Danish Cancer Society

Data Provider: Digital Science