open access publication

Article, 2024

Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Throat Swabs Performed With or Without Specimen Collection From the Tonsils: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Research Protocols, ISSN 1929-0748, Volume 13, Page e47446, 10.2196/47446

Contributors

Hartvigsen, Benedikte (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Jakobsen, Kathrine Kronberg 0000-0003-0336-5411 [2] [3] Benfield, Thomas Lars 0000-0003-0698-9385 [3] [4] Gredal, Niels Tobias [3] Ersbøll, Annette Kjær [3] [5] Grønlund, Mathias Waldemar [2] Bundgaard, Henning 0000-0002-0563-7049 [2] [3] Andersen, Mikkel Porsborg 0000-0001-6162-5205 [6] Steenhard, Nina R 0009-0002-6801-6837 [7] Von Buchwald, Christian 0000-0001-6753-8129 [2] [3] Todsen, Tobias 0000-0003-3267-3560 [1] [2] [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
  2. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Rigshospitalet
  4. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] University of Copenhagen
  6. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Copenhagen University Hospital
  8. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] University of Southern Denmark
  10. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Testing for SARS-CoV-2 is essential to provide early COVID-19 treatment for people at high risk of severe illness and to limit the spread of infection in society. Proper upper respiratory specimen collection is the most critical step in the diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in public settings, and throat swabs were the preferred specimens used for mass testing in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is still a discussion about whether throat swabs have a high enough sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as previous studies have reported a large variability in the sensitivity from 52% to 100%. Many previous studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of throat swabs lack a detailed description of the sampling technique, which makes it difficult to compare the different diagnostic accuracy results. Some studies perform a throat swab by only collecting specimens from the posterior oropharyngeal wall, while others also include a swab of the palatine tonsils for SARS-CoV-2 testing. However, studies suggest that the palatine tonsils could have a tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2 that may improve the SARS-CoV-2 detection during sampling. This may explain the variation of sensitivity reported, but no clinical studies have yet explored the differences in sensitivity and patient discomfort whether the palatine tonsils are included during the throat swab or not. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and patient discomfort of a throat swab including the palatine tonsils compared to only swabbing the posterior oropharyngeal wall in molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We will conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the molecular detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 by a throat swab performed from the posterior oropharyngeal wall and the palatine tonsils (intervention group) or the posterior oropharyngeal wall only (control group). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. All participants fill out a baseline questionnaire upon enrollment in the trial, examining their reason for being tested, symptoms, and previous tonsillectomy. A follow-up questionnaire will be sent to participants to explore the development of symptoms after testing. RESULTS: A total of 2315 participants were enrolled in this study between November 10, 2022, and December 22, 2022. The results from the follow-up questionnaire are expected to be completed at the beginning of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial will provide us with information about whether throat swabs including specimens from the palatine tonsils will improve the diagnostic sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection. These results can, therefore, be used to improve future testing recommendations and provide additional information about tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05611203; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05611203. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/47446.

Keywords

COVID-19, COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 treatment, DERR1, INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER, International, SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 detection, SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection, SARS-CoV-2 testing, SARS-CoV-2 virus, accuracy results, baseline, baseline questionnaire, clinical studies, clinical trials, collection, control group, controlled trials, countries, description, detection, detection of SARS-CoV-2, detection rate of SARS-CoV-2, development, development of symptoms, diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic accuracy results, diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic tests, differences, discomfort, discussion, enrollment, follow-up questionnaire, group, high risk, high risk of severe illness, identifiers, illness, infection, information, intervention, intervention group, mass testing, molecular detection, molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2, molecular detection rate, molecular testing, multicenter, multicenter randomized controlled trial, objective, oropharyngeal wall, palatine, palatine tonsils, pandemic, participants, patient discomfort, patients, people, performance, posterior oropharyngeal wall, protocol, public settings, questionnaire, randomized clinical trials, randomized controlled study, randomized controlled trials, rate of SARS-CoV-2, ratio, recommendations, respiratory specimen collection, results, risk of severe illness, samples, sampling technique, sensitivity, sets, severe illness, society, specimen collection, specimens, spread, spread of infection, study, swab performance, swabs, symptoms, technique, test, testing recommendations, throat, throat swabs, tissue, tissue tropism, tonsillectomy, tonsils, treatment, trials, tropism, variables, variation, variation of sensitivity, virus, wall

Funders

  • Novo Nordisk Foundation

Data Provider: Digital Science