open access publication

Article, 2024

Can LCA be FAIR? Assessing the status quo and opportunities for FAIR data sharing

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, ISSN 0948-3349, 1614-7502, Volume 29, 4, Pages 733-744, 10.1007/s11367-024-02280-3

Contributors

Ghose, Agneta 0000-0003-1972-1433 (Corresponding author) [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Aalborg University
  2. [NORA names: AAU Aalborg University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

AimThe purpose of this study is to assess the status quo of data sharing in LCA in relation to the FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reuse) data principles.MethodsThis study investigates how is LCA data from publicly funded research currently shared. Firstly, the focus is on life cycle inventory data shared in journal articles. Given that FAIR data sharing is not only the responsibility of the LCA practitioner, this study further investigates guidelines (e.g., data sharing standards and data management plans) and infrastructure (repositories, data formats, and nomenclature) to identify the tools and services available to LCA community which are essential to enable FAIR data sharing.ResultsThe study identifies that although there is growing awareness to improve data sharing practices, implementation of FAIR guidelines for data sharing is seldom seen in practice. LCA studies that adhere to FAIR principles are primarily due to use of generic data repositories which provide tools to support data sharing. However, there is no guidance on how LCA specific data should be shared to ensure its findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. This study suggests a workflow to enable FAIRification of LCA data. In addition, the study recommends further efforts within the LCA community on skill and technology development, strategic funding, and recognition of the best practices in relation to data sharing.ConclusionIn conclusion, this study highlights the necessity of data sharing incentives, guidelines, and platforms/repositories specific for the LCA community.

Keywords

AimThe, AimThe purpose, ConclusionIn conclusion, FAIR Guidelines, FAIR data sharing, FAIR principles, FAIRification, LCA, LCA community, LCA data, LCA practitioners, LCA studies, MethodsThis, MethodsThis study, ResultsThe, ResultsThe study, access, article, awareness, community, conclusions, data, data principles, data sharing, data sharing practices, development, fairness, findability, funding, guidelines, implementation, incentives, infrastructure, interoperability, inventory data, investigation guidelines, journal articles, journals, life, life cycle inventory data, opportunities, practice, practitioners, principles, purposes, quo, recognition, research, response, reusability, services, sharing, sharing incentives, sharing practices, skills, specific data, status, status quo, strategic funding, study, technological development, technology, tools, workflow

Funders

  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science