open access publication

Article, 2024

Accuracy of FAST in detecting intraabdominal bleeding in major trauma with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures: a retrospective cohort study

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, ISSN 1432-1068, 1633-8065, Volume 34, 3, Pages 1479-1486, 10.1007/s00590-023-03813-6

Contributors

Jensen, Lasse Rehné 0000-0001-6931-4399 [1] Possfelt-Møller, Emma Marie [1] Nielsen, Allan Evald [1] Singh, Upender Martin [1] Svendsen, Lars Bo 0000-0002-3216-9121 [1] Penninga, Luit 0000-0002-8531-1865 (Corresponding author) [1] [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Rigshospitalet
  2. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Copenhagen
  4. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

PurposeThe Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a tool to rapidly detect intraabdominal and intrapericardial fluid with point-of-care ultrasound. Previous studies have questioned the role of FAST in patients with pelvic fractures. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of FAST to detect clinically significant intraabdominal hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fractures.MethodsWe included all consecutive patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures treated our Level 1 trauma center from 2009–2020. We registered patient and fracture characteristics, FAST investigations and CT descriptions, explorative laparotomy findings, and transfusion needs. We compared FAST to CT and laparotomy findings, and calculated true positive and negative findings, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).ResultsWe included 389 patients. FAST had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 98%, a PPV of 84%, and a NPV of 96% for clinically significant intraabdominal bleeding. Patients with retroperitoneal hematomas were at increased risk for laparotomy both because of True-negative FAST and False-positive FAST.ConclusionFAST is accurate to identify clinically significant intraabdominal blood in patients with severe pelvic fractures and should be a standard asset in these patients. Retroperitoneal hematomas challenge the FAST interpretation and thus the decision making when applying FAST in patients with pelvic fractures.

Keywords

CT, CT descriptions, ConclusionFast, Focused Assessment, MethodsWe, PurposeThe, ResultsWe, accuracy, accuracy of FAST, acetabular, acetabular fractures, assessment, assets, bleeding, blood, characteristics, clinic, cohort study, compare fasting, consecutive patients, decision, decision making, description, fast interpretation, fast investigations, fasting, findings, fluid, fracture, fracture characteristics, hematoma, hemorrhage, increased risk, interpretation, intraabdominal bleeding, intraabdominal hemorrhage, investigation, laparotomy, laparotomy findings, making, needs, negative findings, negative predictive value, patients, pelvic fractures, point-of-care ultrasound, positive predictive value, predictive value, retroperitoneal hematoma, retrospective cohort study, risk, sensitivity, severe pelvic fractures, sonography, specificity, study, transfusion, transfusion needs, trauma, ultrasound, values

Funders

  • Capital Region of Denmark

Data Provider: Digital Science