Article, 2023

Physical Activity and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Pregnancy: Does It Matter during Leisure or Work?

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, ISSN 0195-9131, 1530-0315, Volume 56, 1, Pages 110-117, 10.1249/mss.0000000000003287

Contributors

Liu, Xinyue 0000-0002-2145-1674 [1] Chen, Liwei 0000-0002-8458-5661 [1] Li, Jian 0000-0003-2614-4291 [1] Holtermann, Andreas 0000-0003-4825-5697 [2] Lu, Ruijin 0000-0001-9356-6545 [3] Birukov, Anna 0000-0002-8306-3351 [4] Weir, Natalie L [5] Tsai, Michael Y 0000-0001-7553-3408 [5] Zhang, Cuilin 0000-0002-8014-2708 [4] [6]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of California, Los Angeles
  2. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  3. [2] National Research Centre for the Working Environment
  4. [NORA names: NFA National Research Centre for the Working Environment; Governmental Institutions; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Washington University in St. Louis
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] Harvard University
  8. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  9. [5] University of Minnesota
  10. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA), regardless of domain, is recommended for pregnant individuals in clinical guidelines, but limited evidence is available for work-related PA. This study aimed to examine the associations of occupational (OPA) and leisure-time PA (LTPA) with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), a risk marker for adverse pregnancy outcomes, among pregnant individuals. METHODS: This longitudinal study included 257 workers in the fetal growth cohort. OPA/LTPA and hs-CRP were measured in each trimester. OPA/LTPA was divided into high and low groups by the median level. Multivariable linear regressions were applied to estimate the adjusted geometric mean differences of hs-CRP (mg·L-1) comparing high versus low OPA/LTPA in each trimester and the changes in OPA/LTPA over pregnancy. RESULTS: OPA was positively associated with hs-CRP (high: 5.14 vs low: 3.59; P value: 0.001) in the first trimester, particularly for standing/walking or walking fast, regardless of carrying things. LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP in the second (high: 3.93 vs low: 5.08; 0.02) and third trimesters (high: 3.30 vs low: 4.40; 0.046). Compared with the low OPA + high LTPA group, hs-CRP was higher in both the high OPA + high LTPA and high OPA + low LTPA groups in the first trimester, and in the high OPA + low LTPA group only in the third trimester. The change in OPA during pregnancy was positively associated with hs-CRP, whereas the change in LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP from the second to the third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant individuals, LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP, whereas OPA was positively associated with hs-CRP. More research on OPA's health impact among pregnant individuals is needed, and guidelines may consider the potential unfavorable influence of OPA on pregnant individuals.

Keywords

C-reactive protein, Growth Cohort, OPA, Things, activity, adverse pregnancy outcomes, associated with hs-CRP, association, carrying things, changes, clinical guidelines, cohort, differences, domain, evidence, geometric mean difference, group, guidelines, health impacts, high LTPA group, high leisure-time PA, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, highest sensitivity, hs-CRP, impact, individuals, leisure, leisure-time PA, levels, linear regression, longitudinal study, low group, markers, mean difference, median level, multivariate linear regression, outcomes, physical activity, plasma, plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, pregnant individuals, protein, regression, research, risk, risk markers, standing/walking, study, third trimester, trimester, work-related PA, workers

Funders

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Data Provider: Digital Science