Article, 2024

Direct regeneration of spent lithium-ion batteries: A mini-review

Materials Letters, ISSN 1873-4979, 0167-577X, Volume 357, Page 135724, 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.135724

Contributors

Li, Pengwei 0000-0001-9441-2847 (Corresponding author) [1] Liu, Qiuyue [2] Møller, Martin [1] Wang, Deyong [1] Jensen, Lars Rosgaard 0000-0003-1617-0306 [1] Xia, Xiaoning 0000-0003-2290-9728 (Corresponding author) [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Aalborg University
  2. [NORA names: AAU Aalborg University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Northeastern University
  4. [NORA names: China; Asia, East]

Abstract

Recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (LIB) has emerged as a pressing necessity for addressing resource shortages and mitigating environmental pollution. This article reviews the most advanced spent LIBs recycling technology, namely direct regeneration. Traditional recycling methods have problems with high energy consumption and secondary pollution. In contrast, direct regeneration extends battery life by repairing degraded cathode materials and retains battery energy to the maximum extent. This method includes technologies such as chemical lithiation and recycling of waste graphite. These innovative technologies improve battery cycle life, reduce energy consumption, production costs, and promote sustainable resource management. Direct regeneration technology provides new opportunities to reduce resource waste and reduce environmental pollution. It will promote the sustainable management of spent LIBs and support the development of future renewable energy technologies.

Keywords

Direct regeneration, LIBS, battery, battery cycle life, battery energy, battery life, cathode, cathode materials, chemical lithiation, consumption, cost, cycle life, development, energy, energy consumption, energy technologies, environmental pollution, extent, graphite, high energy consumption, life, lithiation, lithium-ion, lithium-ion batteries, management, materials, maximum extent, method, opportunities, pollution, problem, production, production costs, promoting sustainable resource management, recycling, recycling methods, recycling technologies, reduce energy consumption, reducing environmental pollution, reducing resource waste, regeneration, regeneration technology, renewable energy technologies, resource management, resource shortages, resource waste, resources, secondary pollution, shortage, sustainable management, sustainable resource management, technology, traditional recycling methods, waste, waste graphite

Funders

  • China Scholarship Council

Data Provider: Digital Science