Article, 2023

Healthcare costs associated with opportunistically identifiable vertebral fractures

Bone, ISSN 8756-3282, 1873-2763, Volume 175, Page 116831, 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116831

Contributors

Skjødt, Michael Kriegbaum 0000-0002-2109-8989 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Nicolaes, Joeri 0000-0003-2789-8781 [3] [4] Smith, Christopher Dyer 0000-0002-1909-9245 [5] [6] Libanati, Cesar R 0000-0003-1427-7839 [4] Cooper, Cyrus 0000-0003-3510-0709 [7] [8] [9] Olsen, Kim Rose 0000-0002-0473-4736 [6] Abrahamsen, Bo 0000-0002-2730-6080 [2] [9] [10]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, DK-4300 Holbæk, Denmark; OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 3rd floor, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark. Electronic address: miksk@regionsjaelland.dk.
  2. [NORA names: Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Holbæk Sygehus
  4. [NORA names: Region Zealand; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] KU Leuven
  6. [NORA names: Belgium; Europe, EU; OECD];
  7. [4] UCB Pharma (Belgium)
  8. [NORA names: Belgium; Europe, EU; OECD];
  9. [5] Odense University Hospital
  10. [NORA names: Region of Southern Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vertebral fractures (VFs) are often available on radiological imaging undertaken during daily clinical work, yet the healthcare cost burden of these opportunistically identifiable fractures has not previously been reported. In this study, we examine the direct healthcare costs of subjects with vertebral fractures available for identification on routine CT scans. METHODS: Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures were identified from 2000 routine CT scans. Subjects with VF on the scan were matched 1:2 against subjects with no VF on the scan, and similarly in a 1:3-ratio against a general population cohort. We excluded those subjects who received treatment with osteoporosis medication(s) in the year prior to baseline. Direct healthcare costs, identified from the national Danish registers, were accrued over up to 6 years of follow-up, and reported per day at risk and per year. RESULTS: In subjects undergoing a CT scan, costs were initially high, yet declined over time. Comparing subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture (n = 321) against those subjects with no vertebral fracture (n = 606), mean total healthcare costs per day at risk was numerically higher in the first three years after baseline, while healthcare costs per year were similar between the cohorts. No differences reached statistical significance. When compared to the general population cohort, costs were significantly higher in the vertebral fracture cohort. CONCLUSION: Subjects with vertebral fractures available for identification on routine CT scans incur substantially higher healthcare costs than matched subjects representing the general population, and numerically, albeit non-significantly, higher healthcare costs per day at risk in the short term, as compared to subjects with no visible VF on the CT scan.

Keywords

CT scan, Danish registers, No difference, baseline, burden, clinical work, cohort, cost, cost burden, cost of subjects, days, differences, direct healthcare costs, follow-up, fracture, fracture cohort, general population, general population cohort, healthcare, healthcare cost burden, healthcare costs, identification, identified fractures, images, matched subjects, medication(s, national Danish registers, opportunists, osteoporosis, per year, population, population cohort, prevalent vertebral fractures, radiological imaging, register, risk, routine CT scans, scanning, short-term, significance, statistical significance, study, subjects, term, thoracolumbar vertebral fractures, treatment, vertebral fractures, work, year prior to baseline, years, years of follow-up

Funders

  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
  • Medical Research Council
  • UCB Pharma (Belgium)

Data Provider: Digital Science