open access publication

Article, 2023

Revisiting the association between treatment with antidepressants and mania: A nationwide within‐individual study of 3554 patients with bipolar disorder

Bipolar Disorders, ISSN 1398-5647, 1399-5618, Volume 25, 7, Pages 583-591, 10.1111/bdi.13353

Contributors

Jefsen, Oskar Hougaard 0000-0002-5831-5158 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] [3] Rohde, Christopher 0000-0001-9458-506X [2] [3] Østergaard, Søren Dinesen 0000-0002-8032-6208 [2] [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital—Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark
  2. [NORA names: Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Aarhus University
  4. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital—Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark
  6. [NORA names: Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Antidepressants are commonly used "off-label" for bipolar depression, despite concerns over the risk of potential treatment-emergent mania (or "manic switch"). Treatment-emergent mania is difficult to study with adequate power in clinical trials as it requires a large group of participants and long follow-up. Therefore, naturalistic register-based studies have been applied to assess this phenomenon. Here, we aimed to replicate previous findings and address key methodological limitations that were not previously taken into account. METHODS: We utilized data from nationwide Danish health registries to identify patients with bipolar disorder treated with an antidepressant, either with or without concomitant treatment with a mood stabilizer (drug treatment proxied via redeemed prescriptions). We plotted the incidence of manic and depressive episodes relative to the initiation of antidepressant treatment and compared the incidence of mania in the period prior to and following initiation of antidepressant treatment (within-individual design). RESULTS: In 3554 patients with bipolar disorder initiating treatment with an antidepressant, the number of manic episodes peaked approximately 3 months prior to initiation of antidepressant treatment, and the number of depressive episodes peaked around the initiation of antidepressant prescription. This temporal pattern suggests that antidepressants were used to treat post-manic depression. CONCLUSION: Within-individual designs do not control sufficiently for confounding by indication, when the treatment indication is time-varying. Thus, results from prior within-individual studies of antidepressant treatment in the context of bipolar disorder may be invalid due to time-varying confounding by indication.

Keywords

Danish health registries, adequate power, antidepressant prescriptions, antidepressant treatment, antidepressants, association, bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, clinical trials, concerns, concomitant treatment, confounding, context, context of bipolar disorder, data, depression, depressive episode, design, disorders, episodes, findings, follow-up, group, groups of participants, health registries, incidence, incidence of mania, indicators, initiation, initiation of antidepressant treatment, limitations, long follow-up, longer, mania, manic episodes, methodological limitations, months, months prior to initiation, mood, mood stabilizers, nationwide Danish health registries, off-label, participants, patients, patterns, period, phenomenon, power, prescription, registry, replicate previous findings, results, risk, stability, study, temporal patterns, time-varying, time-varying confounders, treatment, treatment indications, treatment-emergent mania, trials, within-individual design

Funders

  • Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education
  • Lundbeck Foundation
  • Danish Cancer Society
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Health Research Foundation

Data Provider: Digital Science