open access publication

Article, 2022

A machine‐learning approach for predicting impaired consciousness in absence epilepsy

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, ISSN 2328-9503, Volume 9, 10, Pages 1538-1550, 10.1002/acn3.51647

Contributors

Springer, Max 0000-0001-9291-6574 [1] Khalaf, Aya F 0000-0002-3736-580X [1] [2] Vincent, Peter [1] Ryu, Jun Hwan [1] Abukhadra, Yasmina [1] Beniczky, S X E Ndor 0000-0002-6035-6581 [3] [4] Glauser, Tracy A 0000-0003-1520-2732 [5] [6] Krestel, Heinz E 0000-0001-8742-0232 [1] [7] [8] Blumenfeld, Hal (Corresponding author) [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Yale University
  2. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  3. [2] Cairo University
  4. [NORA names: Egypt; Africa];
  5. [3] Aarhus University Hospital
  6. [NORA names: Central Denmark Region; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Filadelfia
  8. [NORA names: Filadelfia - Danish Epilepsy Hospital; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  10. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];

Abstract

Behavior during 3-4 Hz spike-wave discharges (SWDs) in absence epilepsy can vary from obvious behavioral arrest to no detectible deficits. Knowing if behavior is impaired is crucial for clinical care but may be difficult to determine without specialized behavioral testing, often inaccessible in practice. We aimed to develop a pure electroencephalography (EEG)-based machine-learning method to predict SWD-related behavioral impairment. Our classification goals were 100% predictive value, with no behaviorally impaired SWDs misclassified as spared; and maximal sensitivity. First, using labeled data with known behavior (130 SWDs in 34 patients), we extracted EEG time, frequency domain, and common spatial pattern features and applied support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis to classify SWDs as spared or impaired. We evaluated 32 classification models, optimized with 10-fold cross-validation. We then generalized these models to unlabeled data (220 SWDs in 41 patients), where behavior during individual SWDs was not known, but observers reported the presence of clinical seizures. For labeled data, the best classifier achieved 100% spared predictive value and 93% sensitivity. The best classifier on the unlabeled data achieved 100% spared predictive value, but with a lower sensitivity of 35%, corresponding to a conservative classification of 8 patients out of 23 as free of clinical seizures. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of machine learning to predict impaired behavior during SWDs based on EEG features. With additional validation and optimization in a larger data sample, applications may include EEG-based prediction of driving safety, treatment adjustment, and insight into mechanisms of impaired consciousness in absence seizures.

Keywords

EEG, EEG features, EEG time, SWDs, absence, absence seizures, adjustment, analysis, applications, approach, arrest, behavior, behavioral arrest, behavioral impairments, behavioral tests, care, classification, classification goal, classification model, classifier, clinical care, clinical seizures, consciousness, cross-validation, data, data samples, deficits, discriminant analysis, domain, electroencephalography, epilepsy, feasibility, feasibility of machine learning, features, findings, free of clinical seizures, frequency, frequency domain, goal, impaired behavior, impaired consciousness, impairment, labeled data, learning, linear discriminant analysis, machine, machine learning, machine-learning approach, machine-learning methods, maximal sensitivity, mechanism, mechanisms of impaired consciousness, method, model, observations, optimization, patients, pattern features, practice, predictive value, presence, presence of clinical seizures, safety, samples, seizures, sensitivity, spatial pattern features, test, time, treatment, treatment adjustment, unlabeled data, validity, values, vector, vector machine

Funders

  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science