open access publication

Article, 2022

Extracting the interdisciplinary specialty structures in social media data-based research: A clustering-based network approach

Journal of Informetrics, ISSN 1875-5879, 1751-1577, Volume 16, 3, Page 101310, 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101310

Contributors

Fan, Yangliu (Corresponding author) [1] Lehmann, Sune 0000-0001-6099-2345 [1] [2] Blok, Anders 0000-0002-3403-698X [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Copenhagen
  2. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Technical University of Denmark
  4. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

As science is becoming more interdisciplinary and potentially more data driven over time, it is important to investigate the changing specialty structures and the emerging intellectual patterns of research fields and domains. By employing a clustering-based network approach, we map the contours of a novel interdisciplinary domain – research using social media data – and analyze how the specialty structures and intellectual contributions are organized and evolve. We construct and validate a large-scale (N = 12,732) dataset of research papers using social media data from the Web of Science (WoS) database, complementing it with citation relationships from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) database. We conduct cluster analyses in three types of citation-based empirical networks and compare the observed features with those generated by null network models. Overall, we find three core thematic research subfields – interdisciplinary socio-cultural sciences, health sciences, and geo-informatics – that designate the main epicenter of research interests recognized by this domain itself. Nevertheless, at the global topological level of all networks, we observe an increasingly interdisciplinary trend over the years, fueled by publications not only from core fields such as communication and computer science, but also from a wide variety of fields in the social sciences, natural sciences, and technology. Our results characterize the specialty structures of this domain at a time of growing emphasis on big social data, and we discuss the implications for indicating interdisciplinarity.

Keywords

Academic Graph, Health Sciences, Microsoft, Microsoft Academic Graph, Web, Web of Science, analysis, approach, citation relationships, citations, cluster analysis, communication, computer, computer science, conduct cluster analysis, contour, contribution, core, core field, data, data-based research, database, dataset, dataset of research papers, domain, domain research, epicenter, features, field, geo-informatics, graph, health, increase, intellectual contributions, intellectual patterns, interdisciplinarity, interdisciplinary trends, interest, large-scale, levels, media data, model, natural sciences, network, network approach, network model, null network models, paper, publications, relationship, research, research field, research interest, research paper, research subfields, science, social data, social media data, social sciences, socio-cultural sciences, specialty, specialty structure, structure, subfields, technology, topological level, trends, years

Data Provider: Digital Science