open access publication

Article, 2022

Commercial layer hybrids kept under organic conditions: a comparison of range use, welfare, and egg production in two layer strains

Poultry Science, ISSN 1525-3171, 0032-5791, Volume 101, 9, Page 102005, 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102005

Contributors

Wurtz, Kaitlin E (Corresponding author) [1] Thodberg, Karen 0000-0001-8369-9491 [1] Berenjian, Atefeh [2] Foldager, Leslie 0000-0002-2639-826X [1] Tahamtani, Fernanda Machado 0000-0002-4439-9733 [1] [3] Riber, Anja Brinch 0000-0002-8644-3456 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Aarhus University
  2. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Tehran
  4. [NORA names: Iran; Asia, Middle East];
  5. [3] Animalia (Norway)
  6. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Outdoor range areas provide laying hens with improved opportunities to perform natural behaviors and increase the available space per bird, however, birds are also exposed to potentially stressful factors including weather and predators. Ability to cope with challenging environments varies between different strains and must be considered to ensure good welfare. The aim of this study was to determine how suitable 2 hybrids, the Dekalb White (DW) and the Bovans Brown (BB), are for organic production with special emphasis on ranging behavior. A total of 1,200 hens were housed according to organic regulations across 12 flocks of 100 birds. Range and shelter use, effect of weather, vegetation cover, egg production and quality, and mortality were assessed in addition to a range of clinical welfare indicators. Initially a greater proportion of DW hens accessed the range. However, after approximately 2 mo, a greater proportion of BB were using the range and venturing further from the house. DW hens were more likely to use the shelters than BB hens (P < 0.001). Vegetation was also worn away to a greater extent in the BB ranges. Weather affected the proportion of hens that went outside, the distance ranged from the popholes, and shelter use. BB hens were found to have better plumage condition (P < 0.001), fewer footpad lesions (P < 0.001), fewer comb wounds (P < 0.001), and lower mortality rates (P = 0.013). Both hybrids experienced keel bone fractures, though DW hens had more at the cranial portion (P < 0.001) and BB at the caudal portion (P < 0.001). DW hens had an earlier onset of lay and higher egg production than BB hens (P < 0.001), though BB hens laid heavier eggs (P < 0.001) with thicker shells (P = 0.001). Overall, BB hens seemed to perform superiorly or equivalently to the DW hens for all variables apart from egg production. These results demonstrate the importance of considering the strain of bird selected for organic production systems in order for the birds to reap the potential benefits that are offered by outdoor access.

Keywords

BB, BB hens, Bovans, Bovans Brown (BB, Dekalb, ability, access, area, behavior, benefits, birds, bone fractures, caudal portion, comb, comb wounds, comparison, conditions, cover, cranial portion, distance, effect, effects of weather, egg production, eggs, environment, factors, flocks, footpad, footpad lesions, fracture, good welfare, hens, higher egg production, housing, hybrid, improvement opportunities, indicators, keel bone fractures, layer, layer hybrids, layer strain, laying, laying hens, lesions, low mortality rate, mortality, mortality rate, natural behavior, onset, onset of lay, opportunities, organic conditions, organic production systems, organic products, organic regulations, outdoor access, outdoor range area, plumage, plumage condition, popholes, portion, potential benefits, predators, production, production systems, proportion, proportion of BB, proportion of hens, quality, range, range area, ranging behavior, rate, regulation, results, shell, shelter, shelter use, space, strain, strains of birds, stress factors, study, system, thicker shells, use, variables, vegetation, vegetation cover, weather, welfare, welfare indicators, wound

Funders

  • Innovation Fund Denmark
  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science