open access publication

Article, 2022

Comparing the aesthetic experience of classic–romantic and contemporary classical music: An interview study

Psychology of Music, ISSN 0305-7356, 1741-3087, Volume 51, 1, Pages 274-294, 10.1177/03057356221091312

Contributors

Mencke, Iris 0000-0002-1211-2531 (Corresponding author) [1] Seibert, Christoph 0000-0003-1211-9896 [1] [2] Brattico, Elvira 0000-0003-0676-6464 [3] [4] Wald-Fuhrmann, Melanie 0000-0002-3659-4731 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
  2. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Hochschule für Musik Karlsruhe
  4. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Aarhus University
  6. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] University of Bari Aldo Moro
  8. [NORA names: Italy; Europe, EU; OECD]

Abstract

Current models of aesthetic experience of music (AEM) have emerged in the recent years capitalizing on evidence from psychology and neuroscience research, thus modeling mainly cognitive and information processes in the brain. However, a large part of the empirical research on which these models are based is related to Western tonal music, while another style of Western music, namely, contemporary classical music (CCM), has been almost neglected. CCM is often dissonant and lacks a tonal hierarchical structure, as, for example, in serial musical pieces. The current study qualitatively explored aesthetic dimensions of a CCM experience by contrasting it to classic–romantic music (CM). To this end, 16 semi-structured interviews with experts of both CCM ( n = 8) and CM ( n = 8) were conducted. The interview guide consisted of questions relating to physiological, affective, and cognitive dimensions of music listening. We applied qualitative content analysis on the textual material and compared the emerging main and sub-themes between the groups. Our findings show that especially the categories of expectations, physiological and emotional responses, pleasurable aspects, and, lastly, existential relevance revealed striking differences which allow us to conclude that CM and CCM afford distinguishable types of AEM in listeners.

Keywords

Western music, Western tonal music, aesthetic dimension, aesthetic experience, aesthetic experience of music, analysis, aspects, brain, categories, categories of expectations, classical music, cognitive dimensions, contemporary classical music, content analysis, current models, dimensions, emotional responses, empirical research, evidence, existential relevance, expectations, experience of music, experiments, experts, findings, group, guide, hierarchical structure, information, information processing, interview guide, interview study, interviews, listeners, materials, model, music, music listening, musical pieces, neuroscience, neuroscience research, pieces, pleasurable aspects, process, psychology, qualitative content analysis, questions, relevance, research, response, semi-structured interviews, structure, study, style, sub-themes, textual material, tonal music, years

Funders

  • Danish National Research Foundation

Data Provider: Digital Science