open access publication

Article, 2022

Changes towards more sustainable food packaging legislation and practices. A survey of policy makers and stakeholders in Europe

Food Packaging and Shelf Life, ISSN 2214-2894, Volume 32, Page 100856, 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100856

Contributors

Trubetskaya, Anna 0000-0002-6571-3277 (Corresponding author) [1] Scholten, Philip Benjamin Vincent 0000-0001-5187-7003 [2] [3] Corredig, Milena 0000-0002-9036-8866 [4]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Limerick
  2. [NORA names: Ireland; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Adolphe Merkle Institute
  4. [NORA names: Switzerland; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Bloom Biorenewables, Route de l′Ancienne Papeterie 106, Case Postale 146, Marly, 1723 Fribourg, Switzerland
  6. [NORA names: Switzerland; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  7. [4] Aarhus University
  8. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

The European Commission advocates for the implementation of more sustainable food systems. To accelerate the transition towards zero waste for the benefit of citizens, industry, public organizations, and to preserve biodiversity, it is necessary to re-design our relationship with the planet’s resources. The European Commission proposal on the circular economy (2015) has set high targets in relation to reusing, upcycling, and recycling of plastic materials. In this context, it is imperative to re-evaluate how we protect foods with packaging. In this work, we report the results of one-on-one interviews with policy makers, citizens, and industry actors held over the spring/summer period of 2021 across European countries. The interviews (2 per group, 6 per country, for a total of 54 interviews) highlighted the need to advance and improve policies, thereby leading to better industrial and societal practices in the EU. Furthermore, harmonization of policies and practices is needed to achieve the set sustainability targets. Key regional differences across Switzerland, Austria, Germany, Norway, Estonia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Ireland, and Germany became apparent during the interviews, especially in relation to the infrastructure for collecting, sorting and using of packaging waste. The interviews also showed that policymakers and industrial stakeholders have common goals towards a more circular economy. However, such collaborations require a whole systems approach to achieve behavioral changes towards this goal. Using ideation tools, namely the Iceberg model and the Berkana two-loop model, the different food packaging challenges were identified, explored and evaluated in terms of their feasibility and impact on sustainability. Furthermore, the main solutions were categorized in an Impact-effort matrix. These tools, through an extensive analysis, demonstrated that the integration of sustainable food packaging solutions within Europe depends more on policies and stakeholders’ mindsets than on technical aspects.

Keywords

Austria, Commission, Commission’s proposal, EU, Estonia, Europe, European, European Commission, European Commission’s proposal, European countries, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, actors, analysis, aspects, behavioral changes, benefit of citizens, benefits, biodiversity, challenges, changes, circular economy, citizens, collaboration, context, countries, differences, economy, extension analysis, feasibility, food, food packaging solutions, food systems, goal, harmonics, harmonization of policies, iceberg model, icebergs, ideation, ideation tool, impact-effort matrix, implementation, improve policies, industry, industry actors, industry stakeholders, infrastructure, integration, interviews, legislation, makers, materials, matrix, mindset, model, one-on-one interviews, organization, package, packaging challenges, packaging legislation, packaging solutions, packaging waste, period, planet, planet's resources, plastic materials, policy, policy makers, policymakers, practice, proposal, protective foods, public organizations, re-design, recycling, recycling of plastic materials, regional differences, relationship, resources, results, societal practices, solution, sorting, spring/summer period, stakeholders, stakeholders’ mindsets, survey, sustainability, sustainability targets, system, target, technical aspects, tools, transition, two-loop model, waste

Funders

  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology
  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science