open access publication

Article, 2022

Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method

Poultry Science, ISSN 1525-3171, 0032-5791, Volume 101, 5, Page 101806, 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101806

Contributors

Sandøe, Peter 0000-0003-0397-3273 (Corresponding author) [1] Hansen, Henning Otte 0000-0001-9761-1614 [1] Forkman, Björn A 0000-0002-0153-6240 [1] Van Horne, Peter L M [2] Houe, Hans 0000-0002-7040-5586 [1] De Jong, Ingrid C 0000-0003-1811-499X [2] Kjaer, Jørgen Bagger 0000-0001-7010-3791 [1] [3] Nielsen, Søren Saxmose 0000-0003-2417-0787 [1] Palmer, Clare 0000-0001-9098-5330 [4] Rhode, Helle Lottrup Halkjær [1] Christensen, Tove 0000-0003-1741-8190 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Copenhagen
  2. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Wageningen University & Research
  4. [NORA names: Netherlands; Europe, EU; OECD];
  5. [3] Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut
  6. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  7. [4] Texas A&M University
  8. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD]

Abstract

Two kinds of initiatives exist to ensure welfare in broiler production: welfare legislation, where all broiler production in a country or region must comply with legally defined welfare standards; and market driven initiatives, where part of the production must meet specific welfare standards and is sold with a particular label, typically at a price premium, or as part of minimum welfare standards defined by a retailer, a fast-food chain or the like. While the effects of national legislation may be undermined by price competition from lower welfare imported products, the effects of market driven initiatives may be limited by lack of willingness from consumers to pay the extra cost. To investigate how this works out in practice, we compared broiler welfare requirements in 5 European countries, Denmark, Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Sweden, in 2018, by means of the Benchmark method. A number of welfare dimensions, covering the input features typically modified in broiler welfare initiatives, were defined. A total of 27 academic welfare experts (response rate 75%) valued the different levels within each dimension on a 0 to 10 scale, and then weighted the relative contribution of each dimension to overall welfare on a 1 to 5 scale. By combining these values and weights with an inventory of existing welfare initiatives, the additional welfare generated by each initiative was calculated. Together with information on national coverage of each initiative, the Benchmark score for each country's production and consumption of chicken meat was calculated. Sweden achieved a much higher Benchmark for national production due to higher legal standards than any of the four other countries. The Netherlands, on the other hand, achieved a Benchmark for national consumption of chicken at the same level as that found in Sweden, because market driven initiatives complemented more welfare-limited Dutch legislation. So, despite some uncertainties in the Benchmark method, it appears that market driven initiatives can have a strong impact on improving broiler welfare, building on those standards achieved by animal welfare legislation.

Keywords

Denmark, Dutch legislation, European countries, Germany, Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom, animal welfare legislation, benchmark methods, benchmark scores, benchmarks, broiler production, broiler welfare, broilers, chain, chicken, chicken meat, comparison, competition, consumers, consumption, consumption of chicken, consumption of chicken meat, contribution, cost, countries, country's production, coverage, dimensions, effect, effects of market, effects of national legislation, experts, extra costs, fast food, fast-food chains, features, highest benchmark, impact, improve broiler welfare, information, initiation, input, input features, inventory, labeling, lack, lack of willingness, legal standards, legislation, levels, lower welfare, market, meat, method, minimum welfare standards, national consumption, national coverage, national legislation, national product, overall welfare, practice, premium, price, price competition, price premium, production, region, requirements, retailers, scale, scores, standards, uncertainty, units, values, weight, welfare, welfare dimension, welfare experts, welfare initiatives, welfare legislation, welfare requirements, welfare standards, willingness

Data Provider: Digital Science