open access publication

Article, 2020

Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA

Evolution Letters, ISSN 2056-3744, Volume 4, 2, Pages 94-108, 10.1002/evl3.165

Contributors

Dehasque, Marianne 0000-0002-4640-8306 [1] [2] [3] Ávila-Arcos, María C 0000-0003-1691-1696 [4] Díez-Del-Molino, David 0000-0002-9701-5940 [2] [3] Fumagalli, Matteo 0000-0002-4084-2953 [5] Guschanski, Katerina 0000-0002-8493-5457 [6] Lorenzen, Eline Deirdre 0000-0002-6353-2819 [7] Malaspinas, Anna-Sapfo 0000-0003-1001-7511 [8] [9] Marques-Bonet, Tomas 0000-0002-5597-3075 [10] [11] [12] [13] Martin, Michael David 0000-0002-2010-5139 [14] Murray, Gemma G R 0000-0002-9531-1711 [15] Papadopulos, Alexander S T 0000-0001-6589-754X [16] Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard 0000-0002-6591-591X [17] Wegmann, Daniel 0000-0003-2866-6739 [9] [18] Dalén, Love 0000-0001-8270-7613 [1] [3] Foote, Andrew David 0000-0001-7384-1634 [16]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Swedish Museum of Natural History
  2. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Stockholm University
  4. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Centre for Palaeogenetics
  6. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] International Laboratory for Human Genome Research (LIIGH), UNAM Juriquilla, Queretaro, 76230, Mexico
  8. [NORA names: Mexico; America, Central; OECD];
  9. [5] Imperial College London
  10. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];

Abstract

Evolutionary processes, including selection, can be indirectly inferred based on patterns of genomic variation among contemporary populations or species. However, this often requires unrealistic assumptions of ancestral demography and selective regimes. Sequencing ancient DNA from temporally spaced samples can inform about past selection processes, as time series data allow direct quantification of population parameters collected before, during, and after genetic changes driven by selection. In this Comment and Opinion, we advocate for the inclusion of temporal sampling and the generation of paleogenomic datasets in evolutionary biology, and highlight some of the recent advances that have yet to be broadly applied by evolutionary biologists. In doing so, we consider the expected signatures of balancing, purifying, and positive selection in time series data, and detail how this can advance our understanding of the chronology and tempo of genomic change driven by selection. However, we also recognize the limitations of such data, which can suffer from postmortem damage, fragmentation, low coverage, and typically low sample size. We therefore highlight the many assumptions and considerations associated with analyzing paleogenomic data and the assumptions associated with analytical methods.

Keywords

DNA, analytical method, ancestral demography, ancient DNA, assumptions, biologists, biology, changes, chronology, comments, considerations, contemporary populations, coverage, damage, data, dataset, demography, evolutionary biologists, evolutionary biology, evolutionary process, fragments, generation, genetic changes, genomic changes, genomic variation, inclusion, inference, inference of natural selection, limitations, low coverage, method, natural selection, opinion, paleogenomic data, parameters, patterns, patterns of genomic variation, population, population parameters, positive selection, postmortem, postmortem damage, process, purifying, quantification, sample size, samples, selection, selection process, sequencing ancient DNA, series data, signature, size, species, tempo, temporal sampling, time, time series data, variation

Funders

  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • European Research Council
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • European Commission

Data Provider: Digital Science