Article, 2016

Global Health in Radiation Oncology: The Emergence of a New Career Pathway

Seminars in Radiation Oncology, ISSN 1532-9461, 1053-4296, Volume 27, 2, Pages 118-123, 10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.11.003

Contributors

Rodin, Danielle Lee 0000-0001-8279-0621 (Corresponding author) [1] Yap, Mei Ling 0000-0003-4216-2895 [2] Grover, Surbhi [3] Longo, John Maclou [4] Balogun, Onyinye Diane 0000-0002-3857-2675 [5] Turner, Sandra Lynne 0000-0002-7669-8316 [6] Eriksen, Jesper Grau 0000-0002-1145-6033 [7] Coleman, C Norman- [8] Giuliani, Meredith Elana 0000-0003-1827-5590 [1] [9]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Toronto
  2. [NORA names: Canada; America, North; OECD];
  3. [2] UNSW Sydney
  4. [NORA names: Australia; Oceania; OECD];
  5. [3] University of Pennsylvania
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] Medical College of Wisconsin
  8. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  9. [5] Cornell University
  10. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];

Abstract

The massive global shortfall in radiotherapy equipment and human resources in developing countries is an enormous challenge for international efforts in cancer control. This lack of access to treatment has been long-standing, but there is now a growing consensus about the urgent need to prioritize solutions to this problem and that a global strategy is required for them to be successful. An essential element of making radiotherapy universally accessible is a coordinated approach to clinical training and practice. This has been recently recognized by many university departments and clinical training programs. However, formalized training and career promotion tracks in global health within radiation oncology have been slow to emerge, thereby limiting the sustained involvement of students and faculty, and restricting opportunities for leadership in this space. We examine here potential structures and benefits of formalized global health training in radiation oncology. We explore how defining specific competencies in this area can help trainees and practitioners integrate their activities in global health within their existing roles as clinicians, educators, or scientists. This would also help create a new global health track for academic advancement, which could focus on such domains as implementation science, health service, and advocacy. We discuss how effective mentorship models, international partnerships, and institutional twinning arrangements support this work and explore how new resources and funding models might be used to further develop and expand radiation oncology services globally.

Keywords

Formal training, Global, New, University, academic advancement, activity, advances, advocacy, area, arrangement, benefits, cancer, cancer control, career, career pathways, clinical training, clinical training programs, clinicians, competence, consensus, control, countries, department, domain, education, efforts, elements, emergency, equipment, essential element, faculty, funding, funding models, global health, global health tracks, global health training, global shortfall, global strategy, health, health services, health tracking, health training, human resources, implementation, implementation science, international efforts, international partnerships, involvement of students, leadership, mentorship model, model, oncology, oncology services, opportunities, partnership, pathway, potential structure, practice, practitioners, problem, program, promotion track, radiation, radiation oncology, radiation oncology services, radiotherapy, radiotherapy equipment, resources, science, scientists, services, shortfalls, solution, space, strategies, structure, students, sustained involvement, tracking, trainees, training, training program, treatment, twinning arrangements, university departments

Data Provider: Digital Science